Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 3 von 23091
Information and software technology, 2024-08, Vol.172, Article 107469
2024

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Acceptance behavior theories and models in software engineering — A mapping study
Ist Teil von
  • Information and software technology, 2024-08, Vol.172, Article 107469
Ort / Verlag
Elsevier B.V
Erscheinungsjahr
2024
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
Alma/SFX Local Collection
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • The adoption or acceptance of new technologies or ways of working in software development activities is a recurrent topic in the software engineering literature. The topic has, therefore, been empirically investigated extensively. It is, however, unclear which theoretical frames of reference are used in this research to explain acceptance behaviors. In this study, we explore how major theories and models of acceptance behavior have been used in the software engineering literature to empirically investigate acceptance behavior. We conduct a systematic mapping study of empirical studies using acceptance behavior theories in software engineering. We identified 47 primary studies covering 56 theory uses. The theories were categorized into six groups. Technology acceptance models (TAM and its extensions) were used in 29 of the 47 primary studies, innovation theories in 10, and the theories of planned behavior/ reasoned action (TPB/TRA) in six. All other theories were used in at most two of the primary studies. The usage and operationalization of the theories were, in many cases, inconsistent with the underlying theories. Furthermore, we identified 77 constructs used by these studies of which many lack clear definitions. Our results show that software engineering researchers are aware of some of the leading theories and models of acceptance behavior, which indicates an attempt to have more theoretical foundations. However, we identified issues related to theory usage that make it difficult to aggregate and synthesize results across studies. We propose mitigation actions that encourage the consistent use of theories and emphasize the measurement of key constructs.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 0950-5849, 1873-6025
eISSN: 1873-6025
DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107469
Titel-ID: cdi_swepub_primary_oai_lup_lub_lu_se_98c10d3b_be40_4d8e_857c_70f69218dfcd

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX