Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 14 von 23

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Split renal function after treatment of small renal masses: comparison between radiofrequency ablation and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy
Ist Teil von
  • Acta radiologica (1987), 2021-09, Vol.62 (9), p.1248-1256
Ort / Verlag
London, England: SAGE Publications
Erscheinungsjahr
2021
Quelle
Taylor & Francis Journals
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Background Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) are used to treat small renal masses (SRM; ≤4 cm), although there are conflicting results in the changes in creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) after treatment. On contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) images, the quantity and quality of renal function can be evaluated by calculating the split renal function (SRF). Purpose To compare renal function after RFA or LPN treatment of SRMs through evaluation of the SRF in the affected kidney. Material and Methods Single T1a renal tumors successfully treated with RFA (n = 60) or LPN (n = 31) were retrospectively compared. The SRF was calculated on pre-treatment CE-CT images and the first follow-up exam after completed treatment. Serum creatinine and eGFR values were collected simultaneously. To compare renal function outcomes, Student’s t-test and multivariable linear regression models (adjusted to RFA/LPN treatment, pre-treatment SRF/eGFR, BMI, age, tumor characteristics, and Charlson Comorbidity Index) were used. Results SRF was reduced in both groups, although reduction was greater in the LPN group (LPN –5.7%) than in the RFA group (RFA –3.5%; P = 0.013). After adjusted analysis, the LPN group still had greater SRF reduction (difference 3.2%, 95% confidence interval 1.3–1.5; P = 0.001). There was no difference between groups in the change of creatinine/eGFR after treatment. Conclusion Both RFA and LPN are nephron-sparing when treating SRMs. However, in this series, reduction of SRF in the affected kidney was smaller after RFA, having a more favorable preservation of renal function than LPN.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 0284-1851, 1600-0455
eISSN: 1600-0455
DOI: 10.1177/0284185120956281
Titel-ID: cdi_swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_uu_419713

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX