Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Leoncini, Emanuele
• Baranello, Giovanni
• Orioli, Iêda M.
• Annerén, Göran
• Bakker, Marian
• Bianchi, Fabrizio
• Bower, Carol
• Canfield, Mark A.
• Castilla, Eduardo E.
• Cocchi, Guido
• Correa, Adolfo
• De Vigan, Catherine
• Doray, Berenice
• Feldkamp, Marcia L.
• Gatt, Miriam
• Irgens, Lorentz M.
• Lowry, R. Brian
• Maraschini, Alice
• Mc Donnell, Robert
• Morgan, Margery
• Mutchinick, Osvaldo
• Poetzsch, Simone
• Riley, Merilyn
• Ritvanen, Annukka
• Gnansia, Elisabeth Robert
• Scarano, Gioacchino
• Sipek, Antonin
• Tenconi, Romano
• Mastroiacovo, Pierpaolo

Titel

Frequency of holoprosencephaly in the International Clearinghouse Birth Defects Surveillance Systems: Searching for population variations

Ist Teil von

• Birth defects research. A Clinical and molecular teratology, 2008-08, Vol.82 (8), p.585-591

Ort / Verlag

Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company

Erscheinungsjahr

2008

Link zum Volltext

Quelle

MEDLINE

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• BACKGROUND: Holoprosencephaly (HPE) is a developmental field defect of the brain that results in incomplete separation of the cerebral hemispheres that includes less severe phenotypes, such as arhinencephaly and single median maxillary central incisor. Information on the epidemiology of HPE is limited, both because few population‐based studies have been reported, and because small studies must observe a greater number of years in order to accumulate sufficient numbers of births for a reliable estimate. METHODS: We collected data from 2000 through 2004 from 24 of the 46 Birth Defects Registry Members of the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research. This study is based on more than 7 million births in various areas from North and South America, Europe, and Australia. RESULTS: A total of 963 HPE cases were registered, yielding an overall prevalence of 1.31 per 10,000 births. Because the estimate was heterogeneous, possible causes of variations among populations were analyzed: random variation, under‐reporting and over‐reporting bias, variation in proportion of termination of pregnancies among all registered cases and real differences among populations. CONCLUSIONS: The data do not suggest large differences in total prevalence of HPE among the studied populations that would be useful to generate etiological hypotheses. Birth Defects Research (Part A), 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.