Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Taiwan’s free democracy as transnational governance. Reduction of state-centered governance and sovereignty. UN is simultaneous transnational and state-centered entity. Existence of NSAs NGOs, multinational firms, international organizations, and individuals as transnational governance entities, using “softer” governmental mechanisms. Move in governance from public to private, hard to soft, state-centric to socially based, hierarchical and enforced to open and networked. Taiwan’s open society and technological development could make a move in this direction. Taiwan as “non-transnational” nation, retaining state-centered focus on power and governance. Hugues Mignot,, Belgium’s top representative to Taiwan. China’s suppression of Taiwan reducing Taiwan’s overall transnational existence, and Taiwan and China’s recognition of a transnational existence that links the two countries. Taiwan’s recognition of the “states” of its indigenous peoples as a transnational take in affairs. David Pendery’s “New Approach to Diplomatic Bind” with a look at statehood, governance, and recognition in these lights. Introduction of the Union Mondiale, Global Union, with “world citizens.” Introduction of “cosmopolitan democracy,” possible transnational understanding, by David Held. Taiwan as a “true transnational state” (Pendery), and Taiwan’s social movements and other actions in Taiwan as elements of this. A return to the Taiwan diaspora, and transnational participation by Taiwanese actors.