Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Rodríguez-Franco, Luis
• Gracia, Candela
• Juarros-Basterretxea, Joel
• Fernández-Suárez, Asunción
• Rodríguez-Díaz, Francisco Javier

Titel

AGRESORES GENERALISTAS Y ESPECIALISTAS EN VIOLENCIA DE PAREJAS JÓVENES Y ADOLESCENTES: IMPLICACIONES EN LA IMPLEMENTACIÓN DE LOS PROGRAMAS DE PREVENCIÓN

Ist Teil von

• Acción psicológica, 2017-12, Vol.14 (2), p.1-15

Ort / Verlag

Madrid: Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia (UNED)

Erscheinungsjahr

2017

Link zum Volltext

Quelle

EZB Electronic Journals Library

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• The study of teen and youth dating violent relationships (Dating Violence, DV) is a field of special interest, not only because of its prevalence, but also because it constitutes the beginning of the learning of the dynamics of relationships, in which the possibility of establishing habits for later relationships begins. One of the challenges in this field is related to the identification of risk and protection factors that must provide a solid basis for the development of prevention programs. The aim of the present study is to determine if there are differences in the abuse profile among DV specialist (they show their abusive behavior specifically with their affective partner) and generalist batterers (they also express them in other environments and contexts). The sample was 447 women (range age from15 to 26 years; M = 18.77, SD = 2.36). They were grouped per the variable Non-Abused/Abused and, in the latter group, were grouped according to the consideration of the victims about if the aggressor was specialist of generalist. The CUVINO Questionnaire (Dating Violence Questionnaire, DVQ) was applied, which evaluates eight different types of abuse at these ages. MANOVA analysis showed differences between groups in the factors of Humiliation, Coercion and Gender-Based Violence. In addition, small but appreciable effects sizes were found in Detachment, Physical Violence and Emotional Punishment factors. Basing on the results obtained, we discuss the need to consider the type of aggressor (generalist or specialist) in research on DV and its implications in the field of prevention.