Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Fleischmann, Maximilian
• Scholl, Sebastian
• Frietsch, Jochen J.
• Hilgendorf, Inken
• Schrenk, Karin
• Hammersen, Jakob
• Prims, Florian
• Thiede, Christian
• Hochhaus, Andreas
• Schnetzke, Ulf

Titel

Clinical experience with venetoclax in patients with newly diagnosed, relapsed, or refractory acute myeloid leukemia

Ist Teil von

• Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2022-11, Vol.148 (11), p.3191-3202

Ort / Verlag

Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Erscheinungsjahr

2022

Link zum Volltext

Quelle

SpringerLink

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Background Diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with poor outcome in elderly and unfit patients. Recently, approval of the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax (VEN) in combination with hypo-methylating agents (HMA) led to a significant improvement of response rates and survival. Further, application in the relapsed or refractory (r/r) AML setting or in context of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) seems feasible. Methods and patients Fifty-six consecutive adult AML patients on VEN from January 2019 to June 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients received VEN either as first-line treatment, as subsequent therapy (r/r AML excluding prior alloHSCT), or at relapse after alloHSCT. VEN was administered orally in 28-day cycles either combined with HMA or low-dose cytarabine (LDAC). Results After a median follow-up of 11.5 (range 6.1–22.3) months, median overall survival (OS) from start of VEN treatment was 13.3 (2.2–20.5) months, 5.0 (0.8–24.3) months and 4.0 (1.5–22.1) months for first-line, subsequent line treatment and at relapse post-alloHSCT, respectively. Median OS was 11.5 (10–22.3) months from start of VEN when subsequent alloHSCT was carried out. Relapse-free survival (RFS) for the total cohort was 10.2 (2.2 – 24.3) months. Overall response rate (composite complete remission + partial remission) was 51.8% for the total cohort (61.1% for VEN first-line treatment, 52.2% for subsequent line and 42.8% at relapse post-alloHSCT). Subgroup analysis revealed a significantly reduced median OS in FLT3-ITD mutated AML with 3.4 (1.9–4.9) months versus 10.4 (0.8–24.3) months for non-mutated cases, (HR 4.45, 95% CI 0.89–22.13, p  = 0.0002). Patients harboring NPM1 or IDH1/2 mutations lacking co-occurrence of FLT3-ITD showed a survival advantage over patients without those mutations (11.2 (5–24.3) months versus 5.0 (0.8–22.1) months, respectively, (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.23 – 1.21, p  = 0.131). Multivariate analysis revealed mutated NPM1 as a significant prognostic variable for achieving complete remission (CR) (HR 19.14, 95% CI 2.30 – 436.2, p  < 0.05). The most common adverse events were hematological, with grade 3 and 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia reported in 44.6% and 14.5% of patients, respectively. Conclusion Detailed analyses on efficacy for common clinical scenarios, such as first-line treatment, subsequent therapy (r/r AML), and application prior to and post-alloHSCT, are presented. The findings suggest VEN treatment combinations efficacious not only in first-line setting but also in r/r AML. Furthermore, VEN might play a role in a subgroup of patients with failure to conventional chemotherapy as a salvage regimen aiming for potential curative alloHSCT.