Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Sepucha, Karen
• Han, Paul K. J.
• Chang, Yuchiao
• Atlas, Steven J.
• Korsen, Neil
• Leavitt, Lauren
• Lee, Vivian
• Percac-Lima, Sanja
• Mancini, Brittney
• Richter, James
• Scharnetzki, Elizabeth
• Siegel, Lydia C.
• Valentine, K. D.
• Fairfield, Kathleen M.
• Simmons, Leigh H.

Titel

Promoting Informed Decisions About Colorectal Cancer Screening in Older Adults (PRIMED Study): a Physician Cluster Randomized Trial

Ist Teil von

• Journal of general internal medicine : JGIM, 2023-02, Vol.38 (2), p.406-413

Ort / Verlag

Cham: Springer International Publishing

Erscheinungsjahr

2023

Quelle

MEDLINE

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Background For adults aged 76–85, guidelines recommend individualizing decision-making about whether to continue colorectal cancer (CRC) testing. These conversations can be challenging as they need to consider a patient’s CRC risk, life expectancy, and preferences. Objective To promote shared decision-making (SDM) for CRC testing decisions for older adults. Design Two-arm, multi-site cluster randomized trial, assigning physicians to Intervention and Comparator arms. Patients were surveyed shortly after the visit to assess outcomes. Analyses were intention-to-treat. Participants and Setting Primary care physicians affiliated with 5 academic and community hospital networks and their patients aged 76–85 who were due for CRC testing and had a visit during the study period. Interventions Intervention arm physicians completed a 2-h online course in SDM communication skills and received an electronic reminder of patients eligible for CRC testing shortly before the visit. Comparator arm received reminders only. Main Measures The primary outcome was patient-reported SDM Process score (range 0–4 with higher scores indicating more SDM); secondary outcomes included patient-reported discussion of CRC screening, knowledge, intention, and satisfaction with the visit. Key Results Sixty-seven physicians (Intervention n =34 and Comparator n =33) enrolled. Patient participants ( n =466) were on average 79 years old, 50% with excellent or very good self-rated overall health, and 66% had one or more prior colonoscopies. Patients in the Intervention arm had higher SDM Process scores (adjusted mean difference 0.36 (95%CI (0.08, 0.64), p =0.01) than in the Comparator arm. More patients in the Intervention arm reported discussing CRC screening during the visit (72% vs. 60%, p =0.03) and had higher intention to follow through with their preferred approach (58.0% vs. 47.1, p =0.03). Knowledge scores and visit satisfaction did not differ significantly between arms. Conclusion Physician training plus reminders were effective in increasing SDM and frequency of CRC testing discussions in an age group where SDM is essential. Trial Registration The trial is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03959696).