Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 14 von 117
Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2022-08, Vol.23 (8), p.e13732-n/a
2022
Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Commissioning and validation of RayStation treatment planning system for CyberKnife M6
Ist Teil von
  • Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2022-08, Vol.23 (8), p.e13732-n/a
Ort / Verlag
Malden Massachusetts: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Erscheinungsjahr
2022
Quelle
Electronic Journals Library
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Background RaySearch (AB, Stockholm) has released a module for CyberKnife (CK) planning within its RayStation (RS) treatment planning system (TPS). Purpose To create and validate beam models of fixed, Iris, and multileaf collimators (MLC) of the CK M6 for Monte Carlo (MC) and collapsed cone (CC) algorithms in the RS TPS. Methods Measurements needed for the creation of the beam models were performed in a water tank with a stereotactic PTW 60018 diode. Both CC and MC models were optimized in RS by minimizing the differences between the measured and computed profiles and percentage depth doses. The models were then validated by comparing dose from the plans created in RS with both single and multiple beams in different phantom conditions with the corresponding measured dose. Irregular field shapes and off‐axis beams were also tested for the MLC. Validation measurements were performed using an A1SL ionization chamber, EBT3 Gafchromic films, and a PTW 1000 SRS detector. Finally, patient‐specific QAs with gamma criteria of 3%/1 mm were performed for each model. Results The models were created in a straightforward manner with efficient tools available in RS. The differences between computed and measured doses were within ±1% for most of the configurations tested and reached a maximum of 3.2% for measurements at a depth of 19.5‐cm. With respect to all collimators and algorithms, the maximum averaged dose difference was 0.8% when considering absolute dose measurements on the central axis. The patient‐specific QAs led to a mean result of 98% of points fulfilling gamma criteria. Conclusions We created both CC and MC models for fixed, Iris, and MLC collimators in RS. The dose differences for all collimators and algorithms were within ±1%, except for depths larger than 9 cm. This allowed us to validate both models for clinical use.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 1526-9914
eISSN: 1526-9914
DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13732
Titel-ID: cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9359029

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX