Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Unger, Jeff
• Allison, Dale C.
• Kaltoft, Margit
• Lakkole, Kavitha
• Panda, Jayant K.
• Ramesh, Chethana
• Sargin, Mehmet
• Smolyarchuk, Elena
• Twine, Melissa
• Wolthers, Benjamin
• Yarimbas, Gizem
• Zoghbi, Marouan

Titel

Maintenance of glycaemic control with liraglutide versus oral antidiabetic drugs as add‐on therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled with metformin alone: A randomized clinical trial in primary care (LIRA‐PRIME)

Ist Teil von

• Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2022-02, Vol.24 (2), p.204-211

Ort / Verlag

Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Erscheinungsjahr

2022

Quelle

Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Aim To compare (in the LIRA‐PRIME [NCT02730377], a randomized open‐label trial), the efficacy of liraglutide in controlling glycaemia versus an oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (T2D), despite metformin use in a primary care setting (n = 219 sites, n = 9 countries). Materials and Methods Adults (n = 1991) with T2D (HbA1c 7.5%‐9.0%) receiving metformin were randomized 1:1 to liraglutide (≤1.8 mg/d) or one OAD, selected by the investigator, added to metformin, for up to 104 weeks. Primary endpoint: time to inadequate glycaemic control (HbA1c > 7.0%) at two scheduled consecutive visits after week 26. Outcomes were assessed for liraglutide versus a pooled OAD group, and (post hoc) liraglutide versus sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐2 inhibitors, dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors, and sulphonylureas individually. Results Among randomized patients (liraglutide, n = 996; OAD, n = 995), 47.6% were female, mean age was 57.4 years and mean HbA1c was 8.2%. Median time to inadequate glycaemic control was 44 weeks longer with liraglutide versus OAD (109 weeks [25% percentile, 38; 75% percentile, not available] vs. 65 weeks [25% percentile, 35; 75% percentile, 107], P < .0001). Changes in HbA1c and body weight at week 104 or at premature treatment discontinuation significantly favoured liraglutide over OAD. Hypoglycaemia rates were comparable between groups and few patients discontinued because of adverse events (liraglutide, 7.9% [n = 79]; OAD, 4.1% [n = 41]). Similar results were observed in the post hoc analysis for liraglutide versus individual OAD classes. Conclusions Glycaemic control was better maintained with liraglutide versus OAD, supporting liraglutide use when intensifying therapy in primary care patients with T2D.