Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Viprey, Virginie F
• Davis, Georgina L
• Benson, Anthony D
• Ewin, Duncan
• Spittal, William
• Vernon, Jon J
• Rupnik, Maja
• Banz, Alice
• Allantaz, Florence
• Cleuziat, Philippe
• Wilcox, Mark H
• Davies, Kerrie A

Titel

A point-prevalence study on community and inpatient Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI): results from Combatting Bacterial Resistance in Europe CDI (COMBACTE-CDI), July to November 2018

Ist Teil von

• Euro surveillance : bulletin européen sur les maladies transmissibles, 2022-06, Vol.27 (26), p.21

Ort / Verlag

Sweden: Centre Europeen pour la Surveillance Epidemiologique du SIDA (European Centre for the Epidemiological Monitoring of AIDS)

Erscheinungsjahr

2022

Quelle

MEDLINE

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• BackgroundThere is a paucity of data on community-based infection (CDI) and how these compare with inpatient CDI.AimTo compare data on the populations with CDI in hospitals vs the community across 12 European countries.MethodsFor this point-prevalence study (July-November 2018), testing sites sent residual diagnostic material on sampling days to a coordinating laboratory for CDI testing and PCR ribotyping (n = 3,163). Information on whether CDI testing was requested at the original site was used to identify undiagnosed CDI. We used medical records to identify differences between healthcare settings in patient demographics and risk factors for detection of with or without free toxin.ResultsThe CDI positivity rate was 4.4% (country range: 0-16.2) in hospital samples, and 1.3% (country range: 0-2.2%) in community samples. The highest prevalence of toxinotype IIIb (027, 181 and 176) was seen in eastern European countries (56%; 43/77), the region with the lowest testing rate (58%; 164/281). Different predisposing risk factors were observed (use of broad-spectrum penicillins in the community (OR: 8.09 (1.9-35.6), p = 0.01); fluoroquinolones/cephalosporins in hospitals (OR: 2.2 (1.2-4.3), p = 0.01; OR: 2.0 (1.1-3.7), p = 0.02)). Half of community CDI cases were undetected because of absence of clinical suspicion, accounting for three times more undiagnosed adults in the community compared with hospitals (ca 111,000 vs 37,000 cases/year in Europe).ConclusionThese findings support recommendations for improving diagnosis in patients presenting with diarrhoea in the community, to guide good practice to limit the spread of CDI.