Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 11 von 439

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
The Saline Infusion Test for Primary Aldosteronism: Implications of Immunoassay Inaccuracy
Ist Teil von
  • The journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2022-04, Vol.107 (5), p.e2027-e2036
Ort / Verlag
United States: Oxford University Press
Erscheinungsjahr
2022
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
Oxford Journals 2020 Medicine
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Diagnosis of primary aldosteronism (PA) for many patients depends on positive results for the saline infusion test (SIT). Plasma aldosterone is often measured by immunoassays, which can return inaccurate results. This study aimed to establish whether differences in aldosterone measurements by immunoassay versus mass spectrometry (MS) might impact confirmatory testing for PA. This study, involving 240 patients tested using the SIT at 5 tertiary care centers, assessed discordance between immunoassay and MS-based measurements of plasma aldosterone. Plasma aldosterone measured by Liaison and iSYS immunoassays were respectively 86% and 58% higher than determined by MS. With an immunoassay-based SIT cutoff for aldosterone of 170 pmol/L, 78 and 162 patients had, respectivel, negative and positive results. All former patients had MS-based measurements of aldosterone < 117 pmol/L, below MS-based cutoffs of 162 pmol/L. Among the 162 patients with pathogenic SIT results, MS returned nonpathologic results in 62, including 32 under 117 pmol/L. Repeat measurements by an independent MS method confirmed nonpathogenic results in 53 patients with discordant results. Patients with discordant results showed a higher (P < 0.0001) prevalence of nonlateralized than lateralized adrenal aldosterone production than patients with concordant results (83% vs 28%). Among patients with nonlateralized aldosterone production, 66% had discordant results. Discordance was more prevalent for the Liaison than iSYS immunoassay (32% vs 16%; P = 0.0065) and was eliminated by plasma purification to remove interferents. These findings raise concerns about the validity of immunoassay-based diagnosis of PA in over 60% of patients with presumed bilateral disease. We provide a simple solution to minimize immunoassay inaccuracy-associated misdiagnosis of PA.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 0021-972X
eISSN: 1945-7197
DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgab924
Titel-ID: cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9016451

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX