Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Howells, Kelly
• Amp, Mat
• Burrows, Martin
• Brown, Jo
• Brennan, Rachel
• Dickinson, Joanne
• Jackson, Shaun
• Yeung, Wan-Ley
• Ashcroft, Darren
• Campbell, Stephen
• Blakeman, Thomas
• Sanders, Caroline

Titel

Remote primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic for people experiencing homelessness: a qualitative study

Ist Teil von

• British journal of general practice, 2022-07, Vol.72 (720), p.e492-e500

Ort / Verlag

England: Royal College of General Practitioners

Erscheinungsjahr

2022

Quelle

Alma/SFX Local Collection

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• The COVID-19 pandemic has caused unprecedented disruption and change to the organisation of primary care, including for people experiencing homelessness who may not have access to a phone. Little is known about whether the recent changes required to deliver services to people experiencing homelessness will help to address or compound inequality in accessing care. To explore the experience and impact of organisational and technology changes in response to COVID-19 on access to health care for people experiencing homelessness. An action-led and participatory research methodology was employed in three case study sites made up of primary care services delivering care for people experiencing homelessness. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 people experiencing homelessness and 22 clinicians and support workers. Interviews were analysed using a framework approach. The move to remote telephone consultations highlighted the difficulties experienced by participants in accessing health care. These barriers included problems at the practice level associated with remote triage as participants did not always have access to a phone or the means to pay for a phone call. This fostered increased reliance on support workers and clinicians working in the community to provide or facilitate a primary care appointment. The findings have emphasised the importance of addressing practical and technology barriers as well as supporting communication and choice for mode of consultation. The authors argue that consultations should not be remote 'by default' and instead take into consideration both the clinical and social factors underpinning health.