Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Hui, Ben B
• Padeniya, Thilini N
• Rebuli, Nic
• Gray, Richard T
• Wood, James G
• Donovan, Basil
• Duan, Qibin
• Guy, Rebecca
• Hocking, Jane S
• Lahra, Monica M
• Lewis, David A
• Whiley, David M
• Regan, David G
• Seib, Kate L

Titel

A Gonococcal Vaccine Has the Potential to Rapidly Reduce the Incidence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae Infection Among Urban Men Who Have Sex With Men

Ist Teil von

• The Journal of infectious diseases, 2022-03, Vol.225 (6), p.983-993

Ort / Verlag

US: Oxford University Press

Erscheinungsjahr

2022

Quelle

Oxford Journals 2020 Medicine

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Abstract Background A gonococcal vaccine is urgently needed due to increasing gonorrhea incidence and emerging multidrug-resistant gonococcal strains worldwide. Men who have sex with men (MSM) have among the highest incidences of gonorrhea and may be a key target population for vaccination when available. Methods An individual-based, anatomical site-specific mathematical model was used to simulate Neisseria gonorrhoeae transmission in a population of 10 000 MSM. The impact of vaccination on gonorrhea prevalence was assessed. Results With a gonococcal vaccine of 100% or 50% protective efficacy, gonorrhea prevalence could be reduced by 94% or 62%, respectively, within 2 years if 30% of MSM are vaccinated on presentation for sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing. Elimination of gonorrhea is possible within 8 years with vaccines of ≥ 50% efficacy lasting 2 years, providing a booster vaccination is available every 3 years on average. A vaccine’s impact may be reduced if it is not effective at all anatomical sites. Conclusions Our study indicates that with a vaccine of modest efficacy and an immunization strategy that targets MSM presenting for STI screening, the prevalence of gonorrhea in this population could be rapidly and substantially reduced. Modelling was used to assess the potential impact of a Neisseria gonorrhoeaevaccine among MSM. A vaccine of modest efficacy could reduce prevalence substantially, but the impact of vaccination is reduced if the vaccine is ineffective at preventing oropharyngeal infection.