Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Oughourlian, Talia C.
• Yao, Jingwen
• Hagiwara, Akifumi
• Nathanson, David A.
• Raymond, Catalina
• Pope, Whitney B.
• Salamon, Noriko
• Lai, Albert
• Ji, Matthew
• Nghiemphu, Phioanh L.
• Liau, Linda M.
• Cloughesy, Timothy F.
• Ellingson, Benjamin M.

Titel

Relative oxygen extraction fraction (rOEF) MR imaging reveals higher hypoxia in human epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplified compared with non-amplified gliomas

Ist Teil von

• Neuroradiology, 2021-06, Vol.63 (6), p.857-868

Ort / Verlag

Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Erscheinungsjahr

2021

Quelle

MEDLINE

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Purpose Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification promotes gliomagenesis and is linked to lack of oxygen within the tumor microenvironment. Using hypoxia-sensitive spin-and-gradient echo echo-planar imaging and perfusion MRI, we investigated the influence of EGFR amplification on tissue oxygen availability and utilization in human gliomas. Methods This study included 72 histologically confirmed EGFR-amplified and non-amplified glioma patients. Reversible transverse relaxation rate ( R 2 ′), relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV), and relative oxygen extraction fraction (rOEF) were calculated for the contrast-enhancing and non-enhancing tumor regions. Using Student t test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test, median R 2 ′, rCBV, and rOEF were compared between EGFR-amplified and non-amplified gliomas. ROC analysis was performed to assess the ability of imaging characteristics to discriminate EGFR amplification status. Overall survival (OS) was determined using univariate and multivariate cox models. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted and compared using the log-rank test. Results EGFR amplified gliomas exhibited significantly higher median R 2 ′ and rOEF than non-amplified gliomas. ROC analysis suggested that R 2 ′ (AUC = 0.7190; P  = 0.0048) and rOEF (AUC = 0.6959; P  = 0.0156) could separate EGFR status. Patients with EGFR-amplified gliomas had a significantly shorter OS than non-amplified patients. Univariate cox regression analysis determined both R 2 ′ and rOEF significantly influence OS. No significant difference was observed in rCBV between patient cohorts nor was rCBV found to be an effective differentiator of EGFR status. Conclusion Imaging of tumor oxygen characteristics revealed EGFR-amplified gliomas to be more hypoxic and contribute to shorter patient survival than EGFR non-amplified gliomas.