Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 20 von 59

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
A comparison of SARS-CoV-2 wastewater concentration methods for environmental surveillance
Ist Teil von
  • The Science of the total environment, 2021-03, Vol.760, p.144215-144215, Article 144215
Ort / Verlag
Netherlands: Elsevier B.V
Erscheinungsjahr
2021
Quelle
MEDLINE
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Wastewater11Bag-mediated filtration system (BMFS), polyethylene glycol (PEG), Human coronavirus OC43 (OC43), World Health Organization (WHO), Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), wastewater treatment plants (WWTP), Reverse-Transcriptase quantitative-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR). surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 may be a useful supplement to clinical surveillance as it is shed in feces, there are many asymptomatic cases, and diagnostic testing can have capacity limitations and extended time to results. Although numerous studies have utilized wastewater surveillance for SARS-CoV-2, the methods used were developed and/or standardized for other pathogens. This study evaluates multiple methods for concentration and recovery of SARS-CoV-2 and seeded human coronavirus OC43 from municipal primary wastewater and/or sludge from the Greater Seattle Area (March–July 2020). Methods evaluated include the bag-mediated filtration system (BMFS), with and without Vertrel™ extraction, skimmed milk flocculation, with and without Vertrel™ extraction, polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation, ultrafiltration, and sludge extraction. Total RNA was extracted from wastewater concentrates and analyzed for SARS-CoV-2 and OC43 with RT-qPCR. Skimmed milk flocculation without Vertrel™ extraction performed consistently over time and between treatment plants in Seattle-area wastewater with the lowest average OC43 Cq value and smallest variability (24.3; 95% CI: 23.8–24.9), most frequent SARS-CoV-2 detection (48.8% of sampling events), and highest average OC43 percent recovery (9.1%; 95% CI: 6.2–11.9%). Skimmed milk flocculation is also beneficial because it is feasible in low-resource settings. While the BMFS had the highest average volume assayed of 11.9 mL (95% CI: 10.7–13.1 mL), the average OC43 percent recovery was low (0.7%; 95% CI: 0.4–1.0%). Ultrafiltration and PEG precipitation had low average OC43 percent recoveries of 1.0% (95% CI: 0.5–1.6%) and 3.2% (95% CI: 1.3–5.1%), respectively. The slopes and efficiency for the SARS-CoV-2 standard curves were not consistent over time, confirming the need to include a standard curve each run rather than using a single curve for multiple plates. Results suggest that the concentration and detection methods used must be validated for the specific water matrix using a recovery control to assess performance over time. [Display omitted] •SARS-CoV-2 WW surveillance is being done with methods developed for other pathogens.•A 15-week comparison of 5 methods was carried out at 3 Seattle-area treatment plants.•Skimmed milk flocculation performed the most reliably over time and between plants.•RT-qPCR assays are subject to inhibition in the wastewater matrix.•Process controls must be used to validate the method in the specific matrix.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 0048-9697
eISSN: 1879-1026
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144215
Titel-ID: cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7832770

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX