Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 12 von 16
Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, 2020-04, Vol.24 (2), p.e2020.00011
2020

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Challenges to Intraoperative Evaluation of Endometrial Cancer
Ist Teil von
  • Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, 2020-04, Vol.24 (2), p.e2020.00011
Ort / Verlag
United States: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
Erscheinungsjahr
2020
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Intraoperative evaluation of the uterus has been reported to predict risk of lymph node spread in endometrial cancer. Four criteria have been prospectively validated by the Mayo Clinic; histopathology, grade, tumor size, and depth of myometrial invasion. The objective of this study is to assess the accuracy of intraoperative evaluation in a university-affiliated teaching setting. This study was a retrospective chart review of 105 cases of endometrial cancer who underwent robotic-assisted staging from January 2016 through December 2017. Seventy-five cases were included. The mean age was 65 y and mean body mass index was 33 kg/m . Fifty-eight patients (80.6%) had no change between intraoperative and postoperative grade. This yielded a 19.4% discordance rate with a significant disagreement ( = .003, Cohen's κ = 0.705). Fifty-eight patients (82.9%) had no change in depth of invasion. This yielded a 17.1% discordance rate with a significant disagreement ( = .0498, Cohen's kappa of 0.69 [95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.85]). Average tumor diameter was 3.4 cm. Seven patients (11.7%) were upsized from the low-risk (≤2 cm) to the high-risk category (>2 cm). This led to an 11.7% discordance rate, with a significant disagreement ( = .008, Cohen's kappa of 0.69 [95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.89]). In 15 of 75 cases (20%), intraoperative evaluation of the size of the tumor was not possible and deferred to the final pathology report. We conclude the Mayo Clinic Criteria cannot be universally adopted until all four criteria can be validated through a prospective study that includes institutions that have variable resources.

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX