Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 6 von 89
BioMed research international, 2020, Vol.2020, p.5086291-8
2020
Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Comparison of Cochlear Implant Magnets and Their MRI Artifact Size
Ist Teil von
  • BioMed research international, 2020, Vol.2020, p.5086291-8
Ort / Verlag
United States: Hindawi
Erscheinungsjahr
2020
Quelle
MEDLINE
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Introduction. Recent developments regarding cochlear implant magnets (e.g., a bipolar diametral magnet) and refined surgical techniques (e.g., implant positioning) have had a significant impact on the relation between cochlear implants and MRIs, making the reproducible visibility of cochlea and IAC possible. MRI scanning has changed from a contraindication to a diagnostic tool. Magnet artifact size plays a central role in the visual assessment of the cochlea and IAC. Objective. The aim of this study is to compare the CI magnet-related maximum artifact sizes of various cochlea implant systems. Materials and Methods. We performed an in vivo measurement of MRI artifacts at 1.5 and 3 Tesla with three cochlear implant magnet systems (AB 3D, Medel Synchrony, and Oticon ZTI). The implant, including the magnet, was positioned with a head bandage 7.0 cm and 120° from the nasion, external auditory canal. We used a TSE T2w MRI sequence on the axial and coronal plains and compared the artifacts in two volunteers for each tesla strength. Results. Intraindividual artifact size differences between the three magnets are smaller than interindividual maximum artifact size differences. 3 T MRI scans, in comparison to 1.5 T MRI scans, show a difference between soft artifact areas. Conclusion. We observed no major difference between maximum implant magnet artifact sizes of the three implant magnet types.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 2314-6133
eISSN: 2314-6141
DOI: 10.1155/2020/5086291
Titel-ID: cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7199598

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX