UNIVERSI
TÄ
TS-
BIBLIOTHEK
P
ADERBORN
Anmelden
Menü
Menü
Start
Hilfe
Blog
Weitere Dienste
Neuerwerbungslisten
Fachsystematik Bücher
Erwerbungsvorschlag
Bestellung aus dem Magazin
Fernleihe
Einstellungen
Sprache
Deutsch
Deutsch
Englisch
Farbschema
Hell
Dunkel
Automatisch
Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist
gegebenenfalls
nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich.
mehr Informationen...
Universitätsbibliothek
Katalog
Suche
Details
Zur Ergebnisliste
Ergebnis 11 von 1366
Datensatz exportieren als...
BibTeX
Does three‐dimensional anatomy improve student understanding?
Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.), 2020-01, Vol.33 (1), p.25-33
Triepels, Charlotte P. R.
Smeets, Carlijn F. A.
Notten, Kim J. B.
Kruitwagen, Roy F. P. M.
Futterer, Jurgen J.
Vergeldt, Tineke F. M.
Van Kuijk, Sander M. J.
2020
Details
Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Triepels, Charlotte P. R.
Smeets, Carlijn F. A.
Notten, Kim J. B.
Kruitwagen, Roy F. P. M.
Futterer, Jurgen J.
Vergeldt, Tineke F. M.
Van Kuijk, Sander M. J.
Titel
Does three‐dimensional anatomy improve student understanding?
Ist Teil von
Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.), 2020-01, Vol.33 (1), p.25-33
Ort / Verlag
Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Erscheinungsjahr
2020
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
Wiley-Blackwell Full Collection
Beschreibungen/Notizen
We aim to provide an overview of the various digital three‐dimensional visualizations used for learning anatomy and to assess whether these improve medical students' understanding of anatomy compared to traditional learning methods. Furthermore, we evaluate the attitudes of the users of three‐dimensional visualizations. We included articles that compared advanced newer three‐dimensional anatomy visualization methods (i.e., virtual reality, augmented reality, and computer‐based three‐dimensional visualizations) to traditional methods that have been used for a long time (i.e., cadaver and textbooks) with regard to users' understanding of anatomy. Of the 1,148 articles identified, 21 articles reported data on the effectiveness of using three‐dimensional visualization methods compared to two‐dimensional methods. Twelve articles found that three‐dimensional visualization is a significantly more effective learning method compared to traditional methods, whereas nine articles did not find that three‐dimensional visualization was a significantly more effective method. In general, based on these articles, medical students prefer to use three‐dimensional visualizations to learn anatomy. In most of the articles, using three‐dimensional visualization was shown to be a more effective method to gain anatomical knowledge compared to traditional methods. Besides that, students are motivated and interested in using these new visualization methods for learning anatomical structures. Clin. Anat. 32:25–33, 2019. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 0897-3806
eISSN: 1098-2353
DOI: 10.1002/ca.23405
Titel-ID: cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6916638
Format
–
Schlagworte
Anatomy
,
Anatomy - education
,
Augmented reality
,
Computer applications
,
Computer Simulation
,
Education, Medical - methods
,
Humans
,
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
,
Learning
,
Medical students
,
Models, Anatomic
,
Review
,
Simulation Training - methods
,
Students
,
Teaching methods
,
Textbooks
,
three dimensional
,
traditional methods
,
Virtual reality
,
Visualization
Weiterführende Literatur
Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von
bX