Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Khetrapal, Sonalini
• Acharya, Arnab
• Mills, Anne

Titel

Assessment of the public-private-partnerships model of a national health insurance scheme in India

Ist Teil von

• Social science & medicine (1982), 2019-12, Vol.243, p.112634, Article 112634

Ort / Verlag

England: Elsevier Ltd

Erscheinungsjahr

2019

Quelle

PAIS Index

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• A single hospital admission can deplete household resources so considerably as to induce impoverishment, especially in the Indian context of low government healthcare expenditure. Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana (RSBY) was a national health insurance scheme for below-poverty-line Indian families, to provide improved access to hospitalization and greater financial protection via a public-private-partnership employing private sector implementation capacity. Study objectives were to understand governance (including regulatory) environment and contract arrangements; evaluate expansion of services to beneficiaries; and assess compliance of providers and user satisfaction. A case study approach in two districts met the need for in-depth information on scheme functioning, and RSBY implementation was examined between 2011 and 13 in Patiala (Punjab) and Yamunanagar (Haryana). Methods included 20 key stakeholder interviews, analysis of secondary datasets on beneficiaries and claims, primary data collection in 31 public and private hospitals and in greater depth in 12 hospitals, and an exit survey of 751 patients. Enrolled and non-enrolled hospitals were mapped in each district and service availability of enrolled hospitals assessed; enrollee characteristics were analysed; for the 12 hospitals, information was obtained on structural quality and process of care, and patient satisfaction and out-of-pocket payments. The Indian states and the government of India did not specify formal regulatory and implementation procedures in detail and states largely contracted out their functions to private insurance firms. Findings show regulatory weaknesses, and contractual breaches. Enrolment rates were low in both districts and more so for Patiala and there was limited access to services. There was little difference in process of care between public and private hospitals, though the structural capacity of private hospitals was better than public hospitals. RSBY helped improve accessibility and gave some degree of financial protection to patients. It also actively engaged with existing resources in the Indian health care and insurance markets. •Contract specification and compliance were major challenges in RSBY.•Out-of-pocket payment for care was significant, especially in private hospitals.•There were few differences in care quality between public and private hospitals.•RSBY patients were slightly more satisfied than non-RSBY patients.•PPP schemes demand effective regulatory and monitoring systems.