Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Allyse, Megan
• Karkazis, Katrina
• Lee, Sandra Soo-Jin
• Tobin, Sara L.
• Greely, Henry T.
• Cho, Mildred K.
• Magnus, David

Titel

Is HIPAA Enough? Informational Risk, Institutional Review, and Autonomy in the Proposed Changes to the Common Rule

Ist Teil von

• IRB, 2012-01, Vol.34 (3), p.17-19

Erscheinungsjahr

2012

Quelle

Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• In 2011, the Department of Health and Human Services proposed changes to the regulations which govern human subjects protection in Federally funded research. The proposed changes involve modifying inclusion standards for minimal risk research and removing the necessity of review from certain categories of non-invasive research. All studies would instead be required to comply with privacy protections as initiated by the Health Information Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). We argue that relying on HIPAA to protect participants from participation-related risks in non-invasive research is insufficient to protect the autonomy and psychological health of potential research participants. Instead, we suggest a streamlined review format for these categories of research.