Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Fortis, Spyridon
• Comellas, Alejandro
• Make, Barry J
• Hersh, Craig P
• Bodduluri, Sandeep
• Georgopoulos, Dimitris
• Kim, Victor
• Criner, Gerard J
• Dransfield, Mark T
• Bhatt, Surya P

Titel

Combined Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second and Forced Vital Capacity Bronchodilator Response, Exacerbations, and Mortality in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Ist Teil von

• Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2019-07, Vol.16 (7), p.826-835

Ort / Verlag

United States: American Thoracic Society

Erscheinungsjahr

2019

Quelle

Alma/SFX Local Collection

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• The American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society defines a positive bronchodilator response (BDR) by a composite of BDR in either forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV ) and/or forced vital capacity (FVC) greater than or equal to 12% and 200 ml (ATS-BDR). We hypothesized that ATS-BDR components would be differentially associated with important chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) outcomes. To examine whether ATS-BDR components are differentially associated with clinical, functional, and radiographic features in COPD. We included subjects with COPD enrolled in the COPDGene study. In the main analysis, we excluded subjects with self-reported asthma. We categorized BDR into the following: ) No-BDR, no BDR in either FEV or FVC; ) FEV -BDR, BDR in FEV but no BDR in FVC; ) FVC-BDR, BDR in FVC but no BDR in FEV ; and ) Combined-BDR, BDR in both FEV and FVC. We constructed multivariable logistic, linear, zero-inflated negative binomial, and Cox hazards models to examine the association of BDR categories with symptoms, computed tomography findings, change in FEV over time, respiratory exacerbations, and mortality. We also created models using the ATS BDR definition (ATS-BDR) as the main independent variable. Of 3,340 COPD subjects included in the analysis, 1,083 (32.43%) had ATS-BDR, 182 (5.45%) had FEV -BDR, 522 (15.63%) had FVC-BDR, and 379 (11.34%) had Combined-BDR. All BDR categories were associated with FEV decline compared with No-BDR. Compared with No-BDR, both ATS-BDR and Combined-BDR were associated with higher functional residual capacity %predicted, greater internal perimeter of 10 mm, and greater 6-minute-walk distance. In contrast to ATS-BDR, Combined-BDR was independently associated with less emphysema (adjusted beta regression coefficient, -1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.68 to -0.65;  = 0.001), more frequent respiratory exacerbations (incidence rate ratio, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.03-1.50;  = 0.02) and severe exacerbations (incidence rate ratio, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.05-1.71;  = 0.02), and lower mortality (adjusted hazards ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.58-0.99;  = 0.046). Sensitivity analysis that included subjects with self-reported history of asthma showed similar findings. BDR in both FEV and FVC indicates a COPD phenotype with asthma-like characteristics, and provides clinically more meaningful information than current definitions of BDR.