Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 20 von 5455
Translational behavioral medicine, 2017-06, Vol.7 (2), p.292-299
2017

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
A systematic review of smartphone applications for smoking cessation
Ist Teil von
  • Translational behavioral medicine, 2017-06, Vol.7 (2), p.292-299
Ort / Verlag
New York: Oxford University Press
Erscheinungsjahr
2017
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
Oxford Journals 2020 Medicine
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Abstract Tobacco use is the leading cause of preventable disease and death in the USA. However, limited data exists regarding smoking cessation mobile app quality and intervention effectiveness. Innovative and scalable interventions are needed to further alleviate the public health implications of tobacco addiction. The proliferation of the smartphone and the advent of mobile phone health interventions have made treatment more accessible than ever. The purpose of this review was to examine the relation between published scientific literature and available commercial smartphone health apps for smoking cessation to identify the percentage of scientifically supported apps that were commercially available to consumers and to determine how many of the top commercially available apps for smoking cessation were supported by the published scientific literature. Adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, apps were reviewed in four phases: (1) identified apps from the scientific literature, (2) searched app stores for apps identified in the literature, (3) identified top apps available in leading app stores, and (4) determined which top apps available in stores had scientific support. Seven articles identified six apps with some level of scientific support, three (50%) were available in at least one app store. Conversely, among the top 50 apps suggested by each of the leading app stores, only two (4%) had any scientific support. While half of the scientifically vetted apps remain available to consumers, they are difficult to find among the many apps that are identified through app store searches.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 1869-6716
eISSN: 1613-9860
DOI: 10.1007/s13142-017-0492-2
Titel-ID: cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5526818

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX