Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Walker, Amy
• Metcalfe, Peter
• Liney, Gary
• Batumalai, Vikneswary
• Dundas, Kylie
• Glide‐Hurst, Carri
• Delaney, Geoff P
• Boxer, Miriam
• Yap, Mei Ling
• Dowling, Jason
• Rivest‐Henault, David
• Pogson, Elise
• Holloway, Lois

Titel

MRI geometric distortion: Impact on tangential whole‐breast IMRT

Ist Teil von

• Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2016-09, Vol.17 (5), p.7-19

Ort / Verlag

United States: John Wiley and Sons Inc

Erscheinungsjahr

2016

Quelle

Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) geometric distortions when using MRI for target delineation and planning for whole‐breast, intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Residual system distortions and combined systematic and patient‐induced distortions are considered. This retrospective study investigated 18 patients who underwent whole‐breast external beam radiotherapy, where both CT and MRIs were acquired for treatment planning. Distortion phantoms were imaged on two MRI systems, dedicated to radiotherapy planning (a wide, closed‐bore 3T and an open‐bore 1T). Patient scans were acquired on the 3T system. To simulate MRI‐based planning, distortion maps representing residual system distortions were generated via deformable registration between phantom CT and MRIs. Patient CT images and structures were altered to match the residual system distortion measured by the phantoms on each scanner. The patient CTs were also registered to the corresponding patient MRI scans, to assess patient and residual system effects. Tangential IMRT plans were generated and optimized on each resulting CT dataset, then propagated to the original patient CT space. The resulting dose distributions were then evaluated with respect to the standard clinically acceptable DVH and visual assessment criteria. Maximum residual systematic distortion was measured to be 7.9 mm (95%<4.7mm) and 11.9 mm (95%<4.6mm) for the 3T and 1T scanners, respectively, which did not result in clinically unacceptable plans. Eight of the plans accounting for patient and systematic distortions were deemed clinically unacceptable when assessed on the original CT. For these plans, the mean difference in PTV V95 (volume receiving 95% prescription dose) was 0.13±2.51% and −0.73±1.93% for right‐ and left‐sided patients, respectively. Residual system distortions alone had minimal impact on the dosimetry for the two scanners investigated. The combination of MRI systematic and patient‐related distortions can result in unacceptable dosimetry for whole‐breast IMRT, a potential issue when considering MRI‐only radiotherapy treatment planning. PACS number(s): 87.61.‐c, 87.57.cp, 87.57.nj, 87.55.D‐