Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Gariepy, Cheryl E
• Heyman, Melvin B
• Lowe, Mark E
• Pohl, John F
• Werlin, Steven L
• Wilschanski, Michael
• Barth, Bradley
• Fishman, Douglas S
• Freedman, Steven D
• Giefer, Matthew J
• Gonska, Tanja
• Himes, Ryan
• Husain, Sohail Z
• Morinville, Veronique D
• Ooi, Chee Y
• Schwarzenberg, Sarah Jane
• Troendle, David M
• Yen, Elizabeth
• Uc, Aliye

Titel

The Causal Evaluation of Acute Recurrent and Chronic Pancreatitis in Children: Consensus From the INSPPIRE Group

Ist Teil von

• Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, 2017-01, Vol.64 (1), p.95-103

Ort / Verlag

United States: by European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology

Erscheinungsjahr

2017

Link zum Volltext

Quelle

MEDLINE

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• ABSTRACTAcute recurrent pancreatitis (ARP) and chronic pancreatitis (CP) have been diagnosed in children at increasing rates over the past decade. However, as pediatric ARP and CP are still relatively rare conditions, little quality evidence is available on which to base the diagnosis and determination of etiology. OBJECTIVES:To review the current state of the literature regarding the etiology of these disorders and to developed a consensus among a panel of clinically active specialists caring for children with these disorders to help guide the diagnostic evaluation and identify areas most in need of future research. METHODS:A systematic review of the literature was performed and scored for quality, then consensus statements developed and scored by each individual in the group for level of agreement and strength of the supporting data using a modified Delphi method. Scores were analyzed for the level of consensus achieved by the group. RESULTS:The panel reached consensus on 27 statements covering the definitions of pediatric ARP and CP, evaluation for potential etiologies of these disorders, and long-term monitoring. Statements for which the group reached consensus to make no recommendation or could not reach consensus are discussed. CONCLUSION:This consensus helps define the minimal diagnostic evaluation and monitoring of children with ARP and CP. Even in areas in which we reached consensus, the quality of the evidence is weak, highlighting the need for further research. Improved understanding of the underlying cause will facilitate treatment development and targeting.