Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Brockmann, Stefan O.
• Ulrich, Lena
• Piechotowski, Isolde
• Wagner-Wiening, Christiane
• Nöckler, Karsten
• Mayer-Scholl, Anne
• Eichner, Martin

Titel

Risk factors for human Leptospira seropositivity in South Germany

Ist Teil von

• SpringerPlus, 2016-10, Vol.5 (1), p.1796-1796, Article 1796

Ort / Verlag

Cham: Springer International Publishing

Erscheinungsjahr

2016

Link zum Volltext

Quelle

Electronic Journals Library

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• We analyzed risk factors for Leptospira seropositivity in humans, using data from a population-based cross-sectional zoonosis survey in South Germany (2008/9). Out of 1007 participants 42 (4.2 %) were sero-positive (19/446 men; 23/561 women), indicating that Leptospira exposure and sero-conversion is much more frequent than commonly assumed. Relative risks (RR) for seropositivity with exact 95 % confidence intervals (CI; adjusted for specificity and sensitivity of the ELISA test) were calculated for various exposure factors. Contact with pet rats (RR = 13.9 CI [4.8; 25.3]), guinea pigs (3.0[1.1; 7.4]), cattle (3.7[1.3; 9.6]), poultry (3.6[1.3; 8.6]) or livestock (2.3[1.1; 4.9]) as well as occupation as forestry worker (9.2[2.6; 21.4]) were identified as important exposure factors. None of the participants has ever been diagnosed with leptospirosis, yet 45 had experienced symptoms which may have been caused by Leptospira infection (12 with scleral icterus, 25 dark urine, 8 liver inflammation, 7 kidney failure). Three times as many participants with prior symptoms were seropositive as participants without symptoms (RR = 3.4[1.3; 8.3]), suggesting that sero-positive patients with severe symptoms may frequently not be diagnosed as leptospirosis cases. Physicians should consider leptospirosis as a differential diagnosis. Currently, the vast majority of symptomatic leptospirosis patients may neither be diagnosed nor reported.