Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 12 von 441

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Anticipated regret to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening (ARTICS): A randomised controlled trial
Ist Teil von
  • Social science & medicine (1982), 2015-10, Vol.142, p.118-127
Ort / Verlag
England: Elsevier Ltd
Erscheinungsjahr
2015
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
MEDLINE
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Screening is important for early detection of colorectal cancer. Our aim was to determine whether a simple anticipated regret (AR) intervention could increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening. A randomised controlled trial of a simple, questionnaire-based AR intervention, delivered alongside existing pre-notification letters, was conducted. A total of 60,000 adults aged 50–74 years from the Scottish National Screening programme were randomised into the following groups: (1) no questionnaire (control), (2) Health Locus of Control questionnaire (HLOC) or (3) HLOC plus AR questionnaire. The primary outcome was return of the guaiac faecal occult blood test (FOBT). The secondary outcomes included intention to return test kit and perceived disgust (ICK). A total of 59,366 people were analysed as allocated (intention-to-treat (ITT)); no overall differences were seen between the treatment groups on FOBT uptake (control: 57.3%, HLOC: 56.9%, AR: 57.4%). In total, 13,645 (34.2%) individuals returned the questionnaires. Analysis of the secondary questionnaire measures showed that AR indirectly affected FOBT uptake via intention, whilst ICK directly affected FOBT uptake over and above intention. The effect of AR on FOBT uptake was also moderated by intention strength: for less-than-strong intenders only, uptake was 4.2% higher in the AR (84.6%) versus the HLOC group (80.4%) (95% CI for difference (2.0, 6.5)). The findings show that psychological concepts including AR and perceived disgust (ICK) are important factors in determining FOBT uptake. However, the AR intervention had no simple effect in the ITT analysis. It can be concluded that, in those with low intentions, exposure to AR may be required to increase FOBT uptake. The current controlled trials are presented at the website www.controlled-trials.com (number: ISRCTN74986452). •Colorectal cancer is a major cause of deaths worldwide; hence, screening is important for early detection.•Anticipated regret (AR) can lead to a significant increase in screening uptake.•A simple, questionnaire-based AR RCT intervention was tested on 60,000 participants.•No overall effect of the AR intervention on uptake was observed in the ITT analysis.•AR strengthened intentions and increased uptake in those with low intentions.

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX