Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Gobbi, Alberto
• Mahajan, Vivek
• Karnatzikos, Georgios
• Nakamura, Norimasa

Titel

Single- versus Double-bundle ACL Reconstruction: Is There Any Difference in Stability and Function at 3-year Followup?

Ist Teil von

• Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2012-03, Vol.470 (3), p.824-834

Ort / Verlag

New York: Springer-Verlag

Erscheinungsjahr

2012

Link zum Volltext

Quelle

SpringerLink Journals

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Background Despite a number of studies comparing postoperative stability and function after anatomic double-bundle and single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), it remains unclear whether double-bundle reconstruction improves stability or function. Questions/purposes We therefore asked whether patients having single- and double-bundle ACLR using semitendinosus (ST) alone differed with regard to (1) postoperative stability; (2) ROM; and (3) five functional scores. Methods We prospectively followed 60 patients with an isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Thirty patients underwent single-bundle and 30 patients underwent double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Clinically we assessed stability and range of motion (ROM); anteroposterior stability was assessed by Rolimeter and rotational stability by a pivot shift test. Function was assessed by IKDC, Noyes, Lysholm, Marx, and Tegner activity scales. The minimum followup was 36 months (mean, 46.2 months; range, 36–60 months). Results Residual anteroposterior laxity at 3 years postoperatively was similar in both groups: 1.4 ± 0.3 mm versus 1.4 ± 0.2 mm, respectively. We observed no difference in the pivot shift test. ROM was similar in both groups, although double-bundle patients required more physical therapy sessions to gain full ROM. IKDC, Noyes, Lysholm, Marx, and Tegner scores were similar at final followup. Conclusion Double-bundle reconstruction of the ACL did not improve function or stability compared with single-bundle reconstruction. Level of Evidence Level II, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.