UNIVERSI
TÄ
TS-
BIBLIOTHEK
P
ADERBORN
Anmelden
Menü
Menü
Start
Hilfe
Blog
Weitere Dienste
Neuerwerbungslisten
Fachsystematik Bücher
Erwerbungsvorschlag
Bestellung aus dem Magazin
Fernleihe
Einstellungen
Sprache
Deutsch
Deutsch
Englisch
Farbschema
Hell
Dunkel
Automatisch
Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist
gegebenenfalls
nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich.
mehr Informationen...
Universitätsbibliothek
Katalog
Suche
Details
Zur Ergebnisliste
Ergebnis 23 von 52
Datensatz exportieren als...
BibTeX
Study newsletters, community and ethics advisory boards, and focus group discussions provide ongoing feedback for a large biobank
American journal of medical genetics. Part A, 2011-04, Vol.155A (4), p.737-741
McCarty, Catherine A.
Garber, Ann
Reeser, Jonathan C.
Fost, Norman C.
2011
Volltextzugriff (PDF)
Details
Autor(en) / Beteiligte
McCarty, Catherine A.
Garber, Ann
Reeser, Jonathan C.
Fost, Norman C.
Titel
Study newsletters, community and ethics advisory boards, and focus group discussions provide ongoing feedback for a large biobank
Ist Teil von
American journal of medical genetics. Part A, 2011-04, Vol.155A (4), p.737-741
Ort / Verlag
Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
Erscheinungsjahr
2011
Quelle
MEDLINE
Beschreibungen/Notizen
The Personalized Medicine Research Project (PMRP) is a population‐based biobank with more than 20,000 adult participants in central Wisconsin. A Community Advisory Group (CAG) and Ethics and Security Advisory Board (ESAB) provide ongoing feedback. In addition, the study newsletter is used as a two‐way communication tool with study participants. The aim of this study was to assess and compare feedback received from these communication/consultation strategies with results from focus group discussions in relation to protocol changes. In summer 2009, enrollee focus groups were held addressing these topics: newsletter format, readability, and content of three articles written to solicit PMRP subject feedback. The CAG and ESAB jointly reviewed focus group results, discussed protocol changes to access residual blood samples, and made recommendations about the general communication approach. Nearly everyone in three focus groups stated that they wanted more information about PMRP. No focus group participant said that accessing stored samples would have changed their enrollment decision. Most said they wanted to be informed directly about changes affecting their original consent. For minimal‐risk PMRP protocol changes, the community, CAG, and ESAB were comfortable with an opt‐out model because of the initial broad consent. The planned duration of the biobank extends for decades; therefore regular, ongoing communication to enrollees is necessary to maintain awareness and trust, especially relating to protocol changes reflecting evolving science. The multi‐faceted approach to communication including newsletters, external advisory boards, and focus group discussions has been successful for the PMRP biobank and may be a model for others to consider. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 1552-4825, 1552-4833
eISSN: 1552-4833
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.33896
Titel-ID: cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3092645
Format
–
Schlagworte
Adult
,
Behavioral Research
,
biobank
,
Biological and medical sciences
,
Communication
,
community engagement
,
Databases, Genetic - ethics
,
Databases, Genetic - standards
,
Databases, Genetic - statistics & numerical data
,
Ethics
,
Feedback
,
Focus Groups
,
Humans
,
Medical genetics
,
Medical sciences
,
Periodicals as Topic
,
Precision Medicine
,
Reviews
Weiterführende Literatur
Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von
bX