Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Carmichael, David W.
• Thornton, John S.
• Rodionov, Roman
• Thornton, Rachel
• McEvoy, Andrew
• Allen, Philip J.
• Lemieux, Louis

Titel

Safety of localizing epilepsy monitoring intracranial electroencephalograph electrodes using MRI: Radiofrequency-induced heating

Ist Teil von

• Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 2008-11, Vol.28 (5), p.1233-1244

Ort / Verlag

Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company

Erscheinungsjahr

2008

Quelle

MEDLINE

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Purpose To investigate heating during postimplantation localization of intracranial electroencephalograph (EEG) electrodes by MRI. Materials and Methods A phantom patient with a realistic arrangement of electrodes was used to simulate tissue heating during MRI. Measurements were performed using 1.5 Tesla (T) and 3T MRI scanners, using head‐ and body‐transmit RF‐coils. Two electrode‐lead configurations were assessed: a “standard” condition with external electrode‐leads physically separated and a “fault” condition with all lead terminations electrically shorted. Results Using a head‐transmit–receive coil and a 2.4 W/kg head‐average specific absorption rate (SAR) sequence, at 1.5T the maximum temperature change remained within safe limits (<1°C). Under “standard” conditions, we observed greater heating (≤2.0°C) at 3T on one system and similar heating (<1°C) on a second, compared with the 1.5T system. In all cases these temperature maxima occurred at the grid electrode. In the “fault” condition, larger temperature increases were observed at both field strengths, particularly for the depth electrodes. Conversely, with a body‐transmit coil at 3T significant heating (+6.4°C) was observed (same sequence, 1.2/0.5 W/kg head/body‐average) at the grid electrode under “standard” conditions, substantially exceeding safe limits. These temperature increases neglect perfusion, a major source of heat dissipation in vivo. Conclusion MRI for intracranial electrode localization can be performed safely at both 1.5T and 3T provided a head‐transmit coil is used, electrode leads are separated, and scanner‐reported SARs are limited as determined in advance for specific scanner models, RF coils and implant arrangements. Neglecting these restrictions may result in tissue injury. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008;28:1233–1244. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.