Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Stability of the Nicotine Metabolite Ratio in ad Libitum and Reducing Smokers
Ist Teil von
Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention, 2008-06, Vol.17 (6), p.1396-1400
Ort / Verlag
Philadelphia, PA: American Association for Cancer Research
Erscheinungsjahr
2008
Quelle
MEDLINE
Beschreibungen/Notizen
Background: The ratio of two nicotine metabolites, cotinine and trans -3′-hydroxycotinine (3-HC), has been validated as a method of phenotyping the activity of the liver enzyme cytochrome P450
(CYP) 2A6 and, thus, the rate of nicotine metabolism. Our objective was to evaluate the correlates and stability of the 3-HC
to cotinine ratio in ad libitum and reducing smokers, using nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), over a period of months.
Methods: Smokers ( n = 123, 94% Caucasian) participated in a smoking reduction study, where one-third of the sample smoked ad libitum for 8 weeks (Waitlist phase), before joining the rest of the participants for 12 weeks of cigarette reduction (Reduction
phase) using NRT. Urinary nicotine, cotinine, and 3-HC were measured at each visit.
Results: The baseline 3-HC to cotinine ratio was significantly but weakly correlated with cigarettes per day ( r = 0.19), BMI ( r = −0.27), and waking at night to smoke ( r = 0.23). As assessed by repeated measure ANOVA, the 3-HC to cotinine ratio was stable in the Waitlist phase [coefficient
of variation for 3 to 4 measurements, 38% (range, 5-110%)], whereas minor variation was noted in the Reduction phase [coefficient
of variation for 3-5 measurements, 35% (range, 10-107%)].
Conclusions: In nonreducing ad libitum smokers, the 3-HC to cotinine ratio was generally stable, whereas during smoking reduction using NRT, some small variation
was detected. Although the current findings are suggestive of the stability of the 3-HC to cotinine ratio in a predominantly
Caucasian sample smoking freely or reducing smoking with NRT, additional research is needed in more diverse populations. (Cancer
Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2008;17(6):1396–400)