Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Wachter, N.
• Güsgen, C.
• Geis, C.
• Penzkofer, L.S.
• Oldhafer, K.
• Willms, A.G.
• Huber, Tobias

Titel

Status quo of operative training in emergency surgery in Germany – results of a survey

Ist Teil von

• Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2024-06, Vol.409 (1), p.193, Article 193

Ort / Verlag

Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Erscheinungsjahr

2024

Quelle

springer (창간호~2014)

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Background Emergencies and emergency surgeries are a central part of everyday surgical care in Germany. However, it is unclear how emergency surgery is practically trained in clinics on a daily basis and what training concept is underlying. Therefore, the aim of this survey study was to capture the status quo of emergency surgical training of German general and visceral surgeons. Methods The members of the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery were surveyed online ( n  = 5281). The questionnaire included demographic data and expertise in surgery and assistance in emergency surgery regarding common emergency surgical operations. In addition, further training measures in emergency surgery and their support by employers were queried. Results Only complete questionnaires ( n  = 184, response rate 3.5%) were included in the analysis. Most participants were in training ( n  = 69; 38%), followed by senior physicians ( n  = 52; 29%), specialists ( n  = 31; 17%) and chief physicians ( n  = 30; 17%). 64% of the participants were employed at university hospitals or maximum care hospitals. Regarding further training opportunities, in-clinic shock room training was most frequently used. Outside of their own clinic, the ATLS course was most frequently mentioned. Operations for cholecystitis and appendicitis as well as emergency stoma procedures are the most common emergency procedures. There was a strong difference in the frequency of operated cases depending on the level of training. For operations to treat acute abdominal traumas (hemostasis of liver and spleen, packing) as well as outside of visceral surgery, only low competence was reported. Over 90% of survey participants consider emergency surgery to be an indispensable core competence. Neither in the old (76%) nor in the new training regulations (47%) is emergency surgery adequately represented according to the participants’ assessment. There was a significantly lower prevalence of the “sub-steps concept” in emergency surgery at 38% compared to elective surgery (44%). Important elements of imparting skills in emergency surgery are simulation and courses as well as operative sub-steps, according to the majority of survey participants. Conclusion The results show that general and visceral surgeons in Germany are introduced to emergency surgery too little structured during further training and at specialist level. The survey participants had, as expected, hardly any experience in emergency surgery outside of visceral surgery but surprisingly also little experience in visceral surgical trauma care. There is a need to discuss the future organization of emergency surgical training. Adequate simulation structures and extracurricular courses could contribute to an improvement in this respect.