Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Saito, Yuki
• Suzuki, Ryusuke
• Miyamoto, Naoki
• Sutherland, Kenneth Lee
• Kanehira, Takahiro
• Tamura, Masaya
• Mori, Takashi
• Nishioka, Kentaro
• Hashimoto, Takayuki
• Aoyama, Hidefumi

Titel

A new predictive parameter for dose‐volume metrics in intensity‐modulated radiation therapy planning for prostate cancer: Initial phantom study

Ist Teil von

• Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2024-04, Vol.25 (4), p.e14250-n/a

Ort / Verlag

United States: John Wiley and Sons Inc

Erscheinungsjahr

2024

Link zum Volltext

Quelle

MEDLINE

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Background Organ‐at‐risk (OAR) sparing is often assessed using an overlap volume‐based parameter, defined as the ratio of the volume of OAR that overlaps the planning target volume (PTV) to the whole OAR volume. However, this conventional overlap‐based predictive parameter (COPP) does not consider the volume relationship between the PTV and OAR. Purpose We propose a new overlap‐based predictive parameter that consider the PTV volume. The effectiveness of proposed overlap‐based predictive parameter (POPP) is evaluated compared with COPP. Methods We defined as POPP = (overlap volume between OAR and PTV/OAR volume) × (PTV volume/OAR volume). We generated intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) based on step and shoot technique, and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans with the Auto‐Planning module of Pinnacle3 treatment planning system (v14.0, Philips Medical Systems, Fitchburg, WI) using the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group (TG119) prostate phantom. The relationship between the position and size of the prostate phantom was systematically modified to simulate various geometric arrangements. The correlation between overlap‐based predictive parameters (COPP and POPP) and dose‐volume metrics (mean dose, V70Gy, V60Gy, and V37.5 Gy for rectum and bladder) was investigated using linear regression analysis. Results Our results indicated POPP was better than COPP in predicting intermediate‐dose metrics. The bladder results showed a trend similar to that of the rectum. The correlation coefficient of POPP was significantly greater than that of COPP in < 62 Gy (82% of the prescribed dose) region for IMRT and in < 55 Gy (73% of the prescribed dose) region for VMAT regarding the rectum (p < 0.05). Conclusions POPP is superior to COPP for creating predictive models at an intermediate‐dose level. Because rectal bleeding and bladder toxicity can be associated with intermediate‐doses as well as high‐doses, it is important to predict dose‐volume metrics for various dose levels. POPP is a useful parameter for predicting dose‐volume metrics and assisting the generation of treatment plans.