Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Lamy, Andre
• Eikelboom, John
• Tong, Wesley
• Yuan, Fei
• Bangdiwala, Shrikant I.
• Bosch, Jackie
• Connolly, Stuart
• Lonn, Eva
• Dagenais, Gilles R.
• Branch, Kelley R. H.
• Wang, Wei-Jhih
• Bhatt, Deepak L.
• Probstfield, Jeffrey
• Ertl, Georg
• Störk, Stefan
• Steg, P. Gabriel
• Aboyans, Victor
• Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle
• Ryden, Lars
• Yusuf, Salim

Titel

The Cost-Effectiveness of Rivaroxaban Plus Aspirin Compared with Aspirin Alone in the COMPASS Trial: A US Perspective

Ist Teil von

• American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions, 2024-01, Vol.24 (1), p.117-127

Ort / Verlag

Cham: Springer International Publishing

Erscheinungsjahr

2024

Quelle

SpringerLink

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Background Rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily with aspirin 100 mg daily was shown to be better than aspirin 100 mg daily for preventing cardiovascular (CV) death, stroke or myocardial infarction in patients with either stable coronary artery disease (CAD) or peripheral artery disease (PAD). The cost-effectiveness of this regimen in this population is essential for decision-makers to know. Methods US direct healthcare system costs (in USD) were applied to hospitalized events, procedures and study drugs utilized by all patients. We determined the mean cost per participant for the full duration of the trial (mean follow-up of 23 months) plus quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) over a lifetime using a two-state Markov model with 1-year cycle length. Sensitivity analyses were performed on the price of rivaroxaban and the annual discontinuation rate. Results The costs of events and procedures were reduced for Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies (COMPASS) patients who received rivaroxaban 2.5 mg orally (BID) plus acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) compared with ASA alone. Total costs were higher for the combination group ($7426 versus $4173) after considering acquisition costs of the study drug. Over a lifetime, patients receiving rivaroxaban plus ASA incurred $27,255 more and gained 1.17 QALYs compared with those receiving ASA alone resulting in an ICER of $23,295/QALY. ICERs for PAD only and polyvascular disease subgroups were lower. Conclusion Rivaroxaban 2.5 mg BID plus ASA compared with ASA alone was cost-effective (high value) in the USA. COMPASS ClinicalTrials.gov identifier : NCT01776424.