Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Results of laminoplasty versus laminectomy and posterior fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy
Ist Teil von
Annals of medicine and surgery, 2023-10, Vol.85 (10), p.4830-4834
Ort / Verlag
Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Erscheinungsjahr
2023
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)
Beschreibungen/Notizen
Background: The authors compared the clinical, MR, and clinical outcomes for patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM) who underwent laminoplasty (LP) versus laminectomy with fusion (LPSF). Materials and methods: The authors evaluated 65 patients with MCSM (2019–2021) with 31 undergoing LP versus 34 having LPSF. Variables studied included JOA scores, T2W MR hyperintense cord signals, preoperative lordosis, number of stenotic levels, and neurological outcomes. Results: Both groups showed similar preoperative JOA scores, number of stenotic levels, T2-weighted MR hyperintense cord signals, and nearly identifcal 12-month postoperative outcomes (good for 83.9 in the LP group vs. 85.3% in the LPSF group). Differences included: higher preoperative visual analog scale in the LPSF versus LP group, plus the LPSF patients significantly less preoperative cervical lordosis versus LP patients. Conclusion: LP and LPSF used to treat MCSM resulted in similar clinical improvement and 1-year postoperative outcomes. However, our recommendation would be for patients with neck pain, instability, and/or cervical kyphosis to undergo LPSF.