Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Serra-Aracil, X.
• Mora-Lopez, L.
• Gomez-Torres, I.
• Pallisera-Lloveras, A.
• Serracant, A.
• Garcia-Nalda, A.
• Pino-Perez, O.
• Torrecilla, A.
• Navarro-Soto, S.

Titel

Laparoscopic and robotic intracorporeal resection and end-to-end anastomosis in left colectomy: a prospective cohort study — stage 2a IDEAL framework for evaluating surgical innovation

Ist Teil von

• Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2023-04, Vol.408 (1), p.135-135, Article 135

Ort / Verlag

Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Erscheinungsjahr

2023

Quelle

MEDLINE

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Purpose To analyze the safety and feasibility of intracorporeal resection and anastomosis in upper rectum, sigmoid, and left colon surgery, via both laparoscopic and robotic approaches. The secondary aim was to assess possible short-term differences between laparoscopic versus robotic surgery. Methods A prospective observational cohort study according to IDEAL framework exploration and assessment stage (Development, stage 2a), evaluating and comparing the laparoscopic approach and the robotic approach in left colon, sigmoid, and upper rectum surgery with intracorporeal resection and end-to-end anastomosis. Demographic, preoperative, surgical, and postoperative variables of patients undergoing laparoscopic and robotic surgery are described and compared according to the surgical technique used. Results Between May 2020 and March 2022, seventy-nine patients were consecutively included in the study, 41 operated via laparoscopy (laparoscopic left colectomy: LLC) and 38 by robotic surgery (robotic left colectomy: RLC). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of demographic variables. In surgical variables, the median surgical times differed significantly: 198 min (SD 48 min) for LLC vs. 246 min (SD 72 min) for RLC ( p  = 0.01, 95% CI: − 75.2 to − 20.5)). The only significant difference regarding postoperative complications was a higher degree of relevant morbidity in the LLC (Clavien-Dindo > II (14.6% vs. 0%, p  = 0.03) and Comprehensive Complication Index (IQR 22 vs. IQR 0, p  = 0.03). The pathological results were similar in both approaches. Conclusion Laparoscopic and robotic intracorporeal resection and anastomosis are feasible and safe, and obtain similar surgical, postoperative, and pathological results than described in literature. However, morbidity seems to be higher in LLC group with fewer relevant postoperative complications. The results of this study enable us to proceed to stage 2b of the IDEAL framework. Clinical trial registrations The study is registered in Clinical trials with the registration code NCT0445693.