Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Anaesthesiology intensive therapy : official publication of the Polish Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, 2022-01, Vol.54 (4), p.290-294
2022
Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Durapore vs. Hy-Tape for securing endotracheal tubes during general anaesthesia: a prospective randomised controlled non-inferiority trial
Ist Teil von
  • Anaesthesiology intensive therapy : official publication of the Polish Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, 2022-01, Vol.54 (4), p.290-294
Ort / Verlag
Poland
Erscheinungsjahr
2022
Quelle
MEDLINE
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Adhesive tape is commonly used to secure endotracheal tubes (ETT) during general anaesthesia. Although a variety of adhesives are used in practice, few studies have investigated the likelihood of different adhesives in producing facial skin injury. Given that differences in cost exist between adhesives that are often used interchangeably, it would be prudent to use the most economical option. A single-centre, prospective, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial of patients undergoing general anaesthesia with an ETT was conducted. Patients were randomised in a blinded fashion to use Durapore (DP) on either the right or left side of the face to secure the ETT, with Hy-Tape (HT) on the contralateral side. Skin photographs were taken prior to tape application and following tape removal. These were evaluated by three dermatologists to determine presence or absence of facial skin erythema, scaling, oedema, and tearing. Differences were compared using McNemar's test. For outcomes analysis, a non-inferiority margin of 20% difference was used with respect to the 95% CI. Among 112 patients, 33.0% were male, with a mean (SD) age of 55.6 (15.9) years. Comparing DP vs. HT, noninferiority was demonstrated in the patients with skin erythema (1.8% difference, 95% CI: -5.6 to 9.2, P = 0.79), oedema (3.6% difference, 95% CI: -2.8 to 10.0%, P = 0.34), scaling (5.4% difference, 95% CI: -4.1 to 14.8, P = 0.31), and tearing (0.9% difference, 95% CI: -5.2 to 7.3, P > 0.99). There is a non-inferior difference in the proportion of patients with facial skin erythema after use of DP vs. HT to secure the ETT.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 1642-5758
eISSN: 1731-2531
DOI: 10.5114/ait.2022.120640
Titel-ID: cdi_pubmed_primary_36345922

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX