Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Woud, Marcella L.
• Heeren, Alexandre
• Shkreli, Lorika
• Meyer, Thomas
• Egeri, Leonie
• Cwik, Jan C.
• Zlomuzica, Armin
• Kessler, Henrik
• Margraf, Jürgen

Titel

Investigating the effect of proactive interference control training on intrusive memories

Ist Teil von

• European journal of psychotraumatology, 2019-01, Vol.10 (1), p.1611092-1611092

Ort / Verlag

United States: Taylor & Francis

Erscheinungsjahr

2019

Quelle

EZB Electronic Journals Library

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Intrusive re-experiencing is a hallmark symptom of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). According to prominent models of intrusive phenomena, intrusive memories may result from impairments in the efficiency of working memory capacity (WMC), more specifically proactive interference control. Yet, experimental research is scarce. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate experimentally the role of proactive interference control in intrusive memories. We randomly assigned 57 healthy participants to either receive a high interference control training or a low interference control training. Participants were then exposed to highly distressing film clips. WMC was assessed before and after the training. Intrusion symptoms were assessed directly post-training and after one week using an Intrusion Provocation Task (IPT), a one-week intrusions diary, and the retrospective intrusion subscale of the Impact of Event Sale - Revised (IES-R). Results indicated that both groups reported improvements in WMC and fewer intrusions on the second IPT post-training, with no differences between groups. Similarly, no group differences on intrusions were found at one-week follow-up (i.e., intrusion diary and IES-R). To conclude, these data are not consistent with the hypothesis that WMC plays a role in intrusive re-experiencing. Implications for future research are discussed. * Intrusions in PTSD may result from impairments in proactive interference control (PIC).* This study manipulated PIC.* There was no difference in outcomes of high versus low PIC training.* Results do not support a causal role of PIC.