Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Intraindividual comparison between femtosecond laser–assisted and conventional cataract surgery
Ist Teil von
  • Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 2017-02, Vol.43 (2), p.215-222
Ort / Verlag
United States: Elsevier Inc
Erscheinungsjahr
2017
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
MEDLINE
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Purpose To compare the safety and efficacy between femtosecond laser–assisted cataract surgery using the Victus laser system and conventional cataract surgery. Setting Department of Ophthalmology, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria. Design Prospective randomized case series. Methods Both eyes of patients with age-related cataract were randomized to conventional cataract surgery or femtosecond laser–assisted cataract surgery, both with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Postoperative follow-up was at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months and comprised corrected distance visual acuity, endothelial cell density (ECD), central corneal thickness (CCT), and central retinal thickness. The main outcomes were intraoperative and postoperative complications and the effective phacoemulsification time (EPT). Intraocular lens and capsulotomy centration were evaluated using retroillumination slitlamp photography. Results The study enrolled 50 patients. No intraoperative complications occurred in either group. The ECD, CCT, and central retinal thickness were similar between the groups at all follow-up examinations ( P  > .05). The EPT was not statistically significantly different between the groups ( P  = .22). The IOL centration was similar between the groups ( P  = .93). Conclusion Femtosecond laser–assisted and conventional cataract surgery using the mentioned system were equally safe and effective.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 0886-3350
eISSN: 1873-4502
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.11.046
Titel-ID: cdi_pubmed_primary_28366369

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX