Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Pahor, Marco
• Guralnik, Jack M
• Ambrosius, Walter T
• Blair, Steven
• Bonds, Denise E
• Church, Timothy S
• Espeland, Mark A
• Fielding, Roger A
• Gill, Thomas M
• Groessl, Erik J
• King, Abby C
• Kritchevsky, Stephen B
• Manini, Todd M
• McDermott, Mary M
• Miller, Michael E
• Newman, Anne B
• Rejeski, W Jack
• Sink, Kaycee M
• Williamson, Jeff D

Titel

Effect of structured physical activity on prevention of major mobility disability in older adults: the LIFE study randomized clinical trial

Ist Teil von

• JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, 2014-06, Vol.311 (23), p.2387

Ort / Verlag

United States

Erscheinungsjahr

2014

Link zum Volltext

Quelle

MEDLINE

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• In older adults reduced mobility is common and is an independent risk factor for morbidity, hospitalization, disability, and mortality. Limited evidence suggests that physical activity may help prevent mobility disability; however, there are no definitive clinical trials examining whether physical activity prevents or delays mobility disability. To test the hypothesis that a long-term structured physical activity program is more effective than a health education program (also referred to as a successful aging program) in reducing the risk of major mobility disability. The Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders (LIFE) study was a multicenter, randomized trial that enrolled participants between February 2010 and December 2011, who participated for an average of 2.6 years. Follow-up ended in December 2013. Outcome assessors were blinded to the intervention assignment. Participants were recruited from urban, suburban, and rural communities at 8 centers throughout the United States. We randomized a volunteer sample of 1635 sedentary men and women aged 70 to 89 years who had physical limitations, defined as a score on the Short Physical Performance Battery of 9 or below, but were able to walk 400 m. Participants were randomized to a structured, moderate-intensity physical activity program (n = 818) conducted in a center (twice/wk) and at home (3-4 times/wk) that included aerobic, resistance, and flexibility training activities or to a health education program (n = 817) consisting of workshops on topics relevant to older adults and upper extremity stretching exercises. The primary outcome was major mobility disability objectively defined by loss of ability to walk 400 m. Incident major mobility disability occurred in 30.1% (246 participants) of the physical activity group and 35.5% (290 participants) of the health education group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.82 [95% CI, 0.69-0.98], P = .03).Persistent mobility disability was experienced by 120 participants (14.7%) in the physical activity group and 162 participants (19.8%) in the health education group (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.57-0.91]; P = .006). Serious adverse events were reported by 404 participants (49.4%) in the physical activity group and 373 participants (45.7%) in the health education group (risk ratio, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.98-1.20]). A structured, moderate-intensity physical activity program compared with a health education program reduced major mobility disability over 2.6 years among older adults at risk for disability. These findings suggest mobility benefit from such a program in vulnerable older adults. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01072500.