Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Jo, So Young
• Kim, Nayoung
• Lee, Jung Won
• Lim, Ji Hwan
• Choi, Chiun
• Chon, Ilyoung
• Kil, Ho
• Min, Bo Young
• Byoun, Young Sang
• Lee, Ban Seok
• Jang, Sang Eon
• Park, Hyun Kyung
• Jo, Hyun Jin
• Shin, Cheol Min
• Lee, Sang Hyup
• Park, Young Soo
• Hwang, Jin-Hyeok
• Kim, Jin-Wook
• Jeong, Sook-Hyang
• Lee, Dong Ho

Titel

Comparison among conventional 4 L polyethylene glycol, split method of 4 L polyethylene glycol and combination of 2 L polyethylene glycol and sodium phosphate solution for colonoscopy preparation

Ist Teil von

• The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi, 2012-06, Vol.59 (6), p.414

Ort / Verlag

Korea (South)

Erscheinungsjahr

2012

Quelle

MEDLINE

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• The aim of this study was to compare polyethylene glycol (PEG) 4 L, split method of PEG 4 L and PEG 2 L plus sodium phosphate (NaP) in the aspect of bowel preparation quality, safety, patients' compliance and preference. Total 249 subjects were prospectively enrolled and received bowel preparation for colonoscopy from August to October in 2010; PEG 4 L (93 subjects), split method of 4 L PEG (74 subjects) and PEG 2 L plus NaP 90 mL group (82 subjects). To investigate the completion, preference for bowel preparation and safety, a questionnaire survey was conducted before colonoscopy. There were no significant intergroup differences in the aspect of completion of preparation, cecal intubation time and success rate. Satisfaction and preference were higher in PEG 2 L plus NaP 90 mL and split method of 4 L PEG compared with PEG 4 L. In the aspect of the bowel preparation quality PEG 4 L showed significantly higher quality in the morning colonoscopy (p<0.001). However, in the afternoon colonoscopy PEG 2 L plus NaP 90 mL showed better result than PEG 4 L (p=0.009). Hyperphosphatemia was most frequently observed in PEG 2 L plus NaP 90 mL, but no severe adverse events occurred (p<0.001). PEG 4 L showed better result than split method of 4 L PEG or PEG 2 L plus NaP 90 mL in the aspect of bowel preparation quality and safety.