Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 2 von 4
Zhōnghuá xīnxuèguănbìng zázhì, 2011-07, Vol.39 (7), p.625
2011
Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Comparison of cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation for treating atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia
Ist Teil von
  • Zhōnghuá xīnxuèguănbìng zázhì, 2011-07, Vol.39 (7), p.625
Ort / Verlag
China
Erscheinungsjahr
2011
Quelle
MEDLINE
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • To compare the efficacy and safety between cryoablation (Cryo) and radiofrequency (RF) ablation for treating patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Patients with AVNRT (n = 304) were divided into Cryo group (n = 67) and RF group (n = 237). The procedure success rate, complete slow pathway block rate, atrioventricular block rate and relapse rate were compared between two groups. There was no statistically difference between 2 groups in the success rate (Cryo group 98.5% vs RF group 97.0%, P = 0.820), complete slow pathway block rate (Cryo group 98.5% vs RF group 91.6%, P = 0.088), atrioventricular block rate (Cryo group 0 vs RF group 2.5%, P = 0.413), relapse rate (Cryo group 0 vs RF group 1.7%, P = 0.643). But Cryo group had more advantage than RF group. Efficacy and safety were comparable between cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation for treating patients with AVNRT.

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX