Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• BLUMENTHAL, Rosalyn D
• WASKEWICH, Chris
• GOLDENBERG, David M
• LEW, Walter
• FLEFLEH, Christine
• BURTON, Jack

Titel

Chronotherapy and Chronotoxicity of the Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitor, Celecoxib, in Athymic Mice Bearing Human Breast Cancer Xenografts

Ist Teil von

• Clinical cancer research, 2001-10, Vol.7 (10), p.3178-3185

Ort / Verlag

Philadelphia, PA: American Association for Cancer Research

Erscheinungsjahr

2001

Quelle

Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ）

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Purpose: Inhibition of the enzyme cyclooxygenase with celecoxib is cytotoxic in a variety of solid tumor cell lines. Previous work has shown that by charting circadian rhythms, it has been possible to find optimal times to deliver a dose of drug, such that it is most efficacious in killing cancer cells and least harmful to normal tissues. Therefore, we examined the time dependence of toxicity (chronotoxicity) and of antitumor effects (chronotherapy) of celecoxib to determine optimal time of day for dosing with respect to light-dark cycles. Experimental Design: Celecoxib was administered i.p. for 10 days (5 days on, 2 days off, 5 days on) to nude mice bearing s.c. breast xenografts. Body weight, peripheral blood cells, clinical chemistry, and tumor growth were monitored. Results: The highest tolerance (100% survival) was found at 7 HALO and the least occurred at 17 h after light onset (HALO; 10% survival). Chronotherapy at a 20-mg/kg dose varied between the seven HALO evaluated and between the three breast tumors (MCF-7, ZR-75-30, and MDA-MB-468) studied. When the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of celecoxib was optimized for each HALO, we found that at 7–10 HALO, the MTD was 25 mg/kg, whereas at 17–20 HALO; the MTD was only 10 mg/kg. Tumor regression was observed when dosing was done at 23 HALO to 7 HALO (5 a.m. to 1 p.m.), whereas no therapeutic response was observed when dosing was done at 10–13 HALO (4 p.m. to 7 p.m.), and rapid tumor growth was noted when dosing was done at 17 HALO (11 p.m.). Conclusions: Tumor growth response to the MTD at each HALO revealed that there was no clear relationship between dose administered and therapeutic response. COX-2 expression was not able to explain either the chronotherapy or the chronotoxicity results obtained.