Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
This article compares the current regulatory capital requirements under the Dodd-Frank Act (DFA) and the 10 percent leverage ratio, as proposed by the U.S. Treasury and the U.S. House of Representatives' Financial CHOICE Act (FCA). We argue that large banks are much closer to the proposed leverage threshold and, therefore, are more likely to gain from regulatory relief. Small banks, in contrast, would opt to stay under DFA. We also identify a potential moral hazard problem under the FCA, where banks are likely to increase the riskiness of their asset portfolio, with unintended effects on financial stability and to the Basel Accord.