Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2011-09, Vol.92 (9), p.1423-1430
2011
Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Corticospinal Excitability is Dependent on the Parameters of Peripheral Electric Stimulation: A Preliminary Study
Ist Teil von
  • Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2011-09, Vol.92 (9), p.1423-1430
Ort / Verlag
New York, NY: Elsevier Inc
Erscheinungsjahr
2011
Quelle
MEDLINE
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Abstract Chipchase LS, Schabrun SM, Hodges PW. Corticospinal excitability is dependent on the parameters of peripheral electric stimulation: a preliminary study. Objective To evaluate the effect of 6 electric stimulation paradigms on corticospinal excitability. Design Using a same subject pre-post test design, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was used to measure the responsiveness of corticomotor pathway to biceps and triceps brachii muscles before and after 30 minutes of electric stimulation over the biceps brachii. Six different electric stimulation paradigms were applied in random order, at least 3 days apart. Setting Motor control research laboratory. Participants Healthy subjects (N=10; 5 women, 5 men; mean age ± SD, 26±3.6y). Interventions Six different electric stimulation paradigms with varied stimulus amplitude, frequency, and ramp settings. Main Outcome Measure Amplitudes of TMS-induced motor evoked potentials at biceps and triceps brachii normalized to maximal M-wave amplitudes. Results Electric stimulation delivered at stimulus amplitude sufficient to evoke a sensory response at both 10Hz and 100Hz, and stimulus amplitude to create a noxious response at 10Hz decreased corticomotor responsiveness (all P <0.01). Stimulation sufficient to induce a motor contraction (30Hz) applied in a ramped pattern to mimic a voluntary activation increased corticomotor responsiveness ( P =0.002), whereas constant low- and high-intensity motor stimulation at 10Hz did not. Corticomotor excitability changes were similar for both the stimulated muscle and its antagonist. Conclusions Stimulus amplitude (intensity) and the nature (muscle flicker vs contraction) of motor stimulation have a significant impact on changes in corticospinal excitability induced by electric stimulation. Here, we demonstrate that peripheral electric stimulation at stimulus amplitude to create a sensory response reduces corticomotor responsiveness. Conversely, stimulus amplitude to create a motor response increases corticomotor responsiveness, but only the parameters that create a motor response that mimics a voluntary muscle contraction.

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX