Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Bethesda classification of cervicovaginal smears: Reproducibility and viral correlates
Ist Teil von
Human pathology, 1996-06, Vol.27 (6), p.581-585
Ort / Verlag
New York, NY: Elsevier Inc
Erscheinungsjahr
1996
Quelle
Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect (DFG Nationallizenzen)
Beschreibungen/Notizen
Fifty-five cervicovaginal smears from women with squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs) were independently evaluated on two separate occasions by four cytopathologists using a binary classification system (the Bethesda system). Smears were categorized as low-grade (LSIL) or high-grade (HSIL) using previously published criteria. All women had subsequent cervical biopsies containing human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA amplified with the polymerase chain reaction and typed by restriction fragment polymorphism analysis. Three or more observers agreed on classification in 49 of 55 cases (87%); unanimous diagnoses were rendered in 31 cases (56%). Interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility ranged from fair to near-excellent (κ values 0.40 to 0.63; 0.63 to 0.74, respectively). HPV types included HPV 16 (27%), 18 (7%), 31 (9%), 35 (4%), 39 (4%), 6 (10%), 11 (2%), novel types (30%), and multiple types (4%). High-risk HPV types (16, 18, 31, 35, and 39) were significantly associated (
P = .03) with consensus HSIL diagnoses (agreement of three or more observers). This was primarily because of the strong association of HPV 16 with HSIL (
P = .001). After excluding HPV 16, the other high-risk HPV types (18, 31, 35, and 39) were no longer significantly associated with consensus HSIL diagnoses (
P > .5). Conversely, LSIL diagnoses were significantly associated with non—high-risk HPV types (all HPV types except 16, 18, 31, 35, and 39;
P = .006). Binary cytological classification of cervicovaginal SILs is reproducible among cytopathologists. Such classification correlates well with most low-risk HPV types and with the prototypic high-risk HPV 16 but not with other high-risk HPV types.