Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 17 von 48

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Sensitivity of intrapartum group B streptococcal screening and in vitro comparison of four rapid antigen tests
Ist Teil von
  • European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology, 1994-07, Vol.56 (1), p.21-26
Ort / Verlag
Shannon: Elsevier Ireland Ltd
Erscheinungsjahr
1994
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
Elsevier Journal Backfiles on ScienceDirect (DFG Nationallizenzen)
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Objectives: To evaluate the sensitivity of intrapartum screening for group B streptococcal (GBS) colonization and to compare 4 rapid GBS antigen tests in vitro. Design: Two swabs of the lower vagina of 769 parturients were taken; one swab was cultured, the other was frozen at −70 °C until antigen testing with the Group B Strep Test (Quidel) of the culture positive samples was performed. The Quidel test was then compared with 3 other rapid GBS antigen tests in vitro: Wellcogen Strep B (Wellcome Diagnostics), Slidex méningite Strepto B (bioMérieux) and ICON Strep B (Hybritech). The supernatant of 29 GBS cultures in Todd-Hewitt broth was tested in bacterial concentrations of 10 6, 10 7, and 10 8 Colony-Forming Units (CFU)/ml, respectively. Results: Lower vagina GBS carrier rate was 13.4% ( 103 769 ) and heavy colonization (growth density 3 and 4 on blood agar plates) was found in 5.2% ( 40 769 ). The Group B Strep Test detected 11% ( 11 103 ) of GBS carriers, with a sensitivity for heavy colonization of 25% ( 10 40 ). In vitro none of the tests scored positively with a concentration of 10 6 CFU/ml, while with 10 7 CFU/ml the enzyme immunoassay tests (Quidel, Hybritech) were more sensitive (McNemar test, P < 0.05) than the latex agglutination tests (Wellcome Diagnostics, bioMérieux). Conclusions: Although in vitro the enzyme immunoassay tests are more sensitive than the latex agglutination tests, sensitivity in vivo is too low to recommend the use of rapid antigen tests for general screening.

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX