Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Shaheen, Nicholas J., MD, MPH
• Peery, Anne F., MD
• Overholt, Bergein F., MD
• Lightdale, Charles J., MD
• Chak, Amitabh, MD
• Wang, Kenneth K., MD
• Hawes, Robert H., MD
• Fleischer, David E., MD
• Goldblum, John R., MD

Titel

Biopsy depth after radiofrequency ablation of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus

Ist Teil von

• Gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2010-09, Vol.72 (3), p.490-496.e1

Ort / Verlag

Maryland heights, MO: Mosby, Inc

Erscheinungsjahr

2010

Quelle

MEDLINE

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Background After endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus (BE), endoscopic biopsy samples are obtained to assess response to therapy. Whether these biopsies are of adequate depth to assess efficacy is unknown. Objective To compare the depth of endoscopic biopsy samples after RFA with those of untreated controls and to determine the prevalence of subepithelial structures in endoscopic biopsy fragments. Design Secondary analysis of the AIM Dysplasia Trial, a multicenter, randomized, sham-controlled study. Setting Nineteen treatment centers. Patients Subjects with dysplastic BE, either status post RFA or ablation naïve (sham). Main Outcome Measurements The proportion of biopsy samples demonstrating subepithelial structures, stratified by tissue type (columnar vs squamous) in sham- and RFA-treated subjects. Results A total of 5648 biopsy fragments were analyzed from 113 subjects (78 RFA, 35 sham; mean 50.0 fragments per subject). Most fragments (4653, 82.4%) contained subepithelium. Squamous biopsy samples from RFA and sham subjects demonstrated subepithelium at similar rates (78.4% vs 79.1%, respectively, P = not significant [NS]). Columnar biopsy samples from RFA and sham subjects also included subepithelium at similar rates (99.0% vs 98.8%, respectively, P = NS). Regardless of treatment assignment, more columnar than squamous biopsy samples demonstrated subepithelium (98.8% vs 78.5%, P < .001). Limitations Biopsy samples were not individually mounted. Conclusions In both squamous and columnar tissue, endoscopic biopsy samples after RFA were as likely to demonstrate subepithelium as untreated controls. Almost 80% of all biopsy samples were adequate to evaluate for subsquamous intestinal metaplasia. The primary determinant of biopsy depth is the type of epithelium that underwent biopsy, with squamous less likely to yield subepithelium than columnar. Biopsy samples after RFA appear to be of adequate depth to assess response to therapy. (Clinical trial registration number NCT00282672 .)