UNIVERSI
TÄ
TS-
BIBLIOTHEK
P
ADERBORN
Anmelden
Menü
Menü
Start
Hilfe
Blog
Weitere Dienste
Neuerwerbungslisten
Fachsystematik Bücher
Erwerbungsvorschlag
Bestellung aus dem Magazin
Fernleihe
Einstellungen
Sprache
Deutsch
Deutsch
Englisch
Farbschema
Hell
Dunkel
Automatisch
Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist
gegebenenfalls
nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich.
mehr Informationen...
Universitätsbibliothek
Katalog
Suche
Details
Zur Ergebnisliste
Ergebnis 1 von 20374
Datensatz exportieren als...
BibTeX
Systematic review and meta-analysis of enteral nutrition formulations in acute pancreatitis
British journal of surgery, 2009-11, Vol.96 (11), p.1243-1252
Petrov, M. S.
Loveday, B. P. T.
Pylypchuk, R. D.
McIlroy, K.
Phillips, A. R. J.
Windsor, J. A.
2009
Details
Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Petrov, M. S.
Loveday, B. P. T.
Pylypchuk, R. D.
McIlroy, K.
Phillips, A. R. J.
Windsor, J. A.
Titel
Systematic review and meta-analysis of enteral nutrition formulations in acute pancreatitis
Ist Teil von
British journal of surgery, 2009-11, Vol.96 (11), p.1243-1252
Ort / Verlag
Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Erscheinungsjahr
2009
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals
Beschreibungen/Notizen
Background: Although the benefits of enteral nutrition in acute pancreatitis are well established, the optimal composition of enteral feeding is largely unknown. The aim of the study was to compare the tolerance and safety of enteral nutrition formulations in patients with acute pancreatitis. Methods: Electronic databases (Scopus, MEDLINE, Cochrane Controlled Clinical Trials Register) and the proceedings of major pancreatology conferences were searched. Results: Twenty randomized controlled trials, including 1070 patients, met the inclusion criteria. None of the following was associated with a significant difference in feeding intolerance: the use of (semi)elemental versus polymeric formulation (relative risk (RR) 0·62 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 0·10 to 3·97); P = 0·611); supplementation of enteral nutrition with probiotics (RR 0·69 (95 per cent c.i. 0·43 to 1·09); P = 0·110); or immunonutrition (RR 1·60 (95 per cent c.i. 0·31 to 8·29); P = 0·583). The risk of infectious complications and death did not differ significantly in any of the comparisons. Conclusion: The use of polymeric, compared with (semi)elemental, formulation does not lead to a significantly higher risk of feeding intolerance, infectious complications or death in patients with acute pancreatitis. Neither the supplementation of enteral nutrition with probiotics nor the use of immunonutrition significantly improves the clinical outcomes. Copyright © 2009 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Polymeric feeding advocated
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 0007-1323
eISSN: 1365-2168
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.6862
Titel-ID: cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_745631750
Format
–
Schlagworte
Acute Disease
,
Biological and medical sciences
,
Dietary Fiber - administration & dosage
,
Dietary Fiber - adverse effects
,
Enteral Nutrition
,
Food, Formulated - adverse effects
,
Food, Formulated - analysis
,
Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen
,
General aspects
,
Humans
,
Liver. Biliary tract. Portal circulation. Exocrine pancreas
,
Medical sciences
,
Miscellaneous
,
Other diseases. Semiology
,
Pancreatitis - therapy
,
Public health. Hygiene
,
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
,
Publication Bias
,
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Weiterführende Literatur
Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von
bX