Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Hafner, V
• Jäger, M
• Matthée, A‐K
• Ding, R
• Burhenne, J
• Haefeli, W E
• Mikus, G

Titel

Effect of Simultaneous Induction and Inhibition of CYP3A by St John's Wort and Ritonavir on CYP3A Activity

Ist Teil von

• Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2010-02, Vol.87 (2), p.191-196

Ort / Verlag

Basingstoke: Nature Publishing Group

Erscheinungsjahr

2010

Quelle

Wiley Blackwell Single Titles

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• We aimed to assess the effect of coadministration and withdrawal of a potent cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) inhibitor (ritonavir) and a potent CYP3A inducer (St John's wort) on CYP3A enzyme activity in an open, fixed‐sequence study design. We investigated the pharmacokinetics of midazolam: (i) at baseline, (ii) after a single dose of either St John's wort or ritonavir (each n = 6), (iii) after 14 days of coadministration of ritonavir (300 mg b.i.d.) and St John's wort (300 mg t.i.d.), and (iv) at 2 days after cessation of both St John's wort and ritonavir. Combined administration of inducer and inhibitor resulted in a predominance of enzyme inhibition: coadministration of St John's wort and ritonavir with intravenous administration of midazolam resulted in an increase in the area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC)0–8 h of midazolam to 180% of baseline value, whereas with orally administered midazolam, the AUC0–6 h increased to 412% of baseline value (P < 0.05 for each). After cessation of the coadministered drugs, the AUC0–6 h of orally administered midazolam decreased to 6% of the level observed during combined administration, and the AUC0–8 h of intravenously administered midazolam decreased to 33% of the values observed during combined administration (P < 0.001 for each). Induction may be unmasked after the withdrawal of a combination of a potent CYP3A inhibitor and a potent CYP3A inducer, leading to substantial drops in drug exposure of CYP3A substrates. This may require substantial dose adjustments, particularly of orally administered drugs. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2010) 87 2, 191–196. doi:10.1038/clpt.2009.206