Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Influence of five different priming solutions on platelet function in patients undergoing cardiac surgery
Ist Teil von
Anesthesia and analgesia, 1992-02, Vol.74 (2), p.219-225
Ort / Verlag
Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott
Erscheinungsjahr
1992
Quelle
EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
Beschreibungen/Notizen
The ideal choice of a priming solution of the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and its influence on the hemostatic system are not clear. Addition of albumin was reported to inhibit platelet damaging by blood-surface interactions ("coating"). To explore this possibility in 60 consecutive male patients undergoing elective aortocoronary bypass grafting, five different priming solutions were randomly used: (1) 1000 mL of 5% dextrose + 1000 mL of Ringer's solution (RS) + 250 mL of 5% human albumin (HA); (2) 1850 mL of RS + 400 mL of 20% HA; (3) 1750 mL of RS + 500 mL of 10% low molecular weight hydroxyethyl starch (molecular weight average: 200,000; molar substitution ratio: 0.5); (4) 1750 mL of RS + 500 mL of 3.5% gelatin; (5) 2250 mL of RS. Platelet function was studied by aggregometry (= turbidometric technique; 1.0 and 2.0 mumol/L of adenosine diphosphate (ADP), 4 microL/mL of collagen, 25 mumol/L of epinephrine) before, during, and after CPB until the first postoperative day. Blood loss and need for homologous blood was not different between the groups. During CPB, maximum platelet aggregation induced by ADP was least compromised in group 1 and group 4. At the end of the operation ADP-induced aggregation increased in group 1 (+27%), whereas aggregation was decreased in the other priming solution groups. A significant increase in maximum aggregation was found in group 1 even on the first postoperative day (+132% +/- 16%). Collagen-induced aggregation was also least compromised in group 1. Epinephrine-induced platelet aggregation did not change and was similar for all groups. Maximum gradient of aggregation was influenced in an identical way as maximum aggregation.